Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 73 (73):16-43 (1999)
|Abstract||It is widely assumed that the normativity of conceptual judgement poses problems for naturalism. Thus John McDowell urges that 'The structure of the space of reasons stubbornly resists being appropriated within a naturalism that conceives nature as the realm of law' (1994, p 73). Similar sentiments have been expressed by many other writers, for example Robert Brandom (1994, p xiii) and Paul Boghossian (1989, p 548)|
|Keywords||Ethics Judgment Normativity Truth Mcdowell, J|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Paul A. Boghossian (2003). The Normativity of Content. Philosophical Issues 13 (1):31-45.
Ruth Chang (2009). Voluntarist Reasons and the Sources of Normativity. In David Sobel & Steven Wall (eds.), Reasons for Action. Cambridge University Press.
Bruno Mölder (2008). Normativity and Deflationary Theories of Truth. Studia Philosophica Estonica 1 (2):179-193.
Mario de Caro & David Macarthur (eds.) (2010). Naturalism and Normativity. Columbia University Press.
Wybo Houkes (2002). Normativity in Quine's Naturalism: The Technology of Truth-Seeking? [REVIEW] Journal for General Philosophy of Science 33 (2):251-267.
David Copp (2007). Morality in a Natural World: Selected Essays in Metaethics. Cambridge University Press.
Santiago Echeverri (2011). McDowell's Conceptualist Therapy for Skepticism. European Journal of Philosophy 19 (3):357-386.
Julia Tanney (1999). Normativity and Judgement. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 73 (1):17 - 61.
Julia Tanney (1999). Normativity and Judgment II. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 73 (73):45-61.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads97 ( #8,350 of 722,929 )
Recent downloads (6 months)12 ( #9,694 of 722,929 )
How can I increase my downloads?