Reply to Lewis: Metaphysics versus epistemology

Analysis 69 (1):89-91 (2009)
Peter J. Lewis argued that the Everettian interpretation of quantum mechanics implies the unpopular halfer position in the Sleeping Beauty debate. We retorted that it is perfectly coherent to be an Everettian and an ordinary thirder. In a recent reply to our paper Lewis further clarifies the basis for his thinking. We think this brings out nicely where he goes wrong: he underestimates the importance of metaphysical considerations in determining rational credences.
Keywords Everett interpretation  Many-worlds interpretation  Quantum Sleeping Beauty  Sleeping Beauty paradox
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/analys/ann014
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 15,831
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Alastair Wilson (2013). Everettian Confirmation and Sleeping Beauty. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science (3):axt018.
Darren Bradley (2015). Everettian Confirmation and Sleeping Beauty: Reply to Wilson. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 66 (3):683-693.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

41 ( #80,558 of 1,724,852 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

7 ( #93,212 of 1,724,852 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.