Mind and Language 13 (3):370–399 (1998)
|Abstract||The set of English modal verbs is widely recognized to communicate two broad clusters of meanings: epistemic and root modal meanings. A number of researchers have claimed that root meanings are acquired earlier than epistemic ones; this claim has subsequently been employed in the linguistics literature as an argument for the position that English modal verbs are polysemous (Sweetser, 1990). In this paper I offer an alternative explanation for the later emergence of epistemic interpretations by linking them to the development of the child’s theory of mind (Wellman, 1990); if correct, this hypothesis might have important implications for the shape of the semantics of modal verbs.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Valentine Hacquard (2009). On the Interaction of Aspect and Modal Auxiliaries. Linguistics and Philosophy 32 (3):279-315.
Jean-Pierre Koenig & Anthony R. Davis (2001). Sublexical Modality and the Structure of Lexical Semantic Representations. Linguistics and Philosophy 24 (1):71-124.
Renzhi Li (2009). Part Iiib. Aspects of Modality: A Contrastive Study of the Semantic Functions and Pragmatic Uses of Modal Verbs in English and Chinese. In Dingfang Shu & Ken Turner (eds.), Contrasting Meanings in Languages of the East and West. Peter Lang.
Eve Sweetser (1990). From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure. Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads23 ( #60,181 of 722,874 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?