David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Kantian Review 12 (2):128-146 (2007)
In his later moral writings Kant claims that we have a duty to cultivate certain aspects of our sensuous nature. This claim is surprising for three reasons. First, given Kant’s ‘incorporation thesis’ − which states that the only sensible states capable of determining our actions are those that we willingly introduce and integrate into our maxims − it would seem that the content of our inclinations is morally irrelevant. Second, the exclusivity between the passivity that is characteristic of sensibility and the spontaneous quality of our free will that operates throughout Kant’s philosophy seems to preclude that any such cultivation is possible. Third, Kant’s specific arguments concerning why we are obliged to cultivate our sensible nature are unclear. The goal of this paper is to address each of these three concerns and thus fully explain Kant’s theory of the moral necessity of cultivation.
|Keywords||Kant Sensibility Moral Psychology|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Immanuel Kant (2006). Anthropology From a Pragmatic Point of View. Cambridge University Press.
Henry E. Allison (1990). Kant's Theory of Freedom. Cambridge University Press.
Paul Guyer (2000). Kant on Freedom, Law, and Happiness. Cambridge University Press.
Marcia Baron (1995). Kantian Ethics Almost Without Apology. Cornell University Press.
Barbara Herman (1981). On the Value of Acting From the Motive of Duty. Philosophical Review 90 (3):359-382.
Citations of this work BETA
Alix Cohen (2015). The Role of Feelings in Kant's Account of Moral Education. Journal of Philosophy of Education 50 (2).
Ido Geiger (2011). Rational Feelings and Moral Agency. Kantian Review 16 (2):283-308.
Similar books and articles
Owen Ware (2010). Kant, Skepticism, and Moral Sensibility. Dissertation, University of Toronto
Stephen A. Sherblom (2012). What Develops in Moral Development? A Model of Moral Sensibility. Journal of Moral Education 41 (1):117-142.
Robin Wang (2010). The Virtuous Body at Work: The Ethical Life as Qi 氣 in Motion. Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 9 (3):339-351.
David N. James (1991). Kant's Virtue Ethics and the Cultivation of Moral Skills. Social Philosophy Today 6:29-41.
Sharon M. Chubbuck, Terry J. Burant & Joan L. Whipp (2007). The Presence and Possibility of Moral Sensibility in Beginning Pre-Service Teachers. Ethics and Education 2 (2):109-130.
Joan L. Whipp, Terry J. Burant & Sharon M. Chubbuck (2007). The Presence and Possibility of Moral Sensibility in Beginning Pre-Service Teachers. Ethics and Education 2 (2):109-130.
Scott R. Stroud (2011). Moral Cultivation in Kant and Xunzi. Journal of Chinese Philosophy 38 (4):538-555.
Kenneth R. Westphal (1997). Noumenal Causality Reconsidered: Affection, Agency, and Meaning in Kant. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 27 (2):209 - 245.
Chris W. Surprenant (2007). Cultivating Virtue: Moral Progress and the Kantian State. Kantian Review 12 (1):90-112.
Paul Saurette (2002). Kant's Culture of Humiliation: Politics and Ethical Cultivation. Philosophy and Social Criticism 28 (1):59-90.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads41 ( #101,059 of 1,906,922 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #468,570 of 1,906,922 )
How can I increase my downloads?