David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Arthur Pap’s work played an important role in the development of the analytic tradition. This role goes beyond the merely historical fact that Pap’s views of dispositional and modal concepts were influential. As a sympathetic critic of logical empiricism, Pap, like Quine, saw a deep tension in logical empiricism at its very best in the work of Carnap. But Pap’s critique of Carnap is quite different from Quine’s, and represents the discovery of limits beyond which empiricism cannot go, where there lies nothing other than intuitive knowledge of logic itself. Pap’s arguments for this intuitive knowledge anticipate Etchemendy’s recent critique of the model-theoretic account of logical consequence. Pap’s work also anticipates prominent developments in the contemporary neo-Fregean philosophy of mathematics championed by Wright and Hale. Finally, Pap’s major philosophical preoccupation, the concepts of necessity and possibility, provides distinctive solutions and perspectives on issues of contemporary concern in the metaphysics of modality. In particular, Pap’s account of modality allows us to see the significance of Kripke’s well-known arguments on necessity and apriority in a new light.
|Keywords||Logical positivism Positivism Logic|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$152.82 new (62% off) $152.82 used (62% off) $286.70 direct from Amazon (29% off) Amazon page|
|Call number||B824.6.P37 2006|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Michael Friedman (1999). Reconsidering Logical Positivism. Cambridge University Press.
Arthur Pap (1960). Reply to “Arthur Pap on Meaning Rules”. Philosophical Studies 11 (3):38 - 41.
Kevin Timpe (2006). A Critique of Frankfurt-Libertarianism. Philosophia 34 (2):189-202.
Michael W. Martin (1964). The Explanatory Value of the Unconscious. Philosophy of Science 31 (April):122-132.
Arthur Pap (1949). Synonymity and Logical Equivalence. Analysis 9 (4):51 - 57.
Arthur Pap (1948). Logical Nonsense. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 9 (2):269-283.
Arthur Pap (1959). Nominalism, Empiricism and Universals--I. Philosophical Quarterly 9 (37):330-340.
Arthur Pap (1960). Nominalism, Empiricism and Universals--II. Philosophical Quarterly 10 (38):44-60.
Jaegwon Kim (2003). Logical Positivism and the Mind-Body Problem. In Paolo Parrini, Wes Salmon & Merrilee Salmon (eds.), Logical Empiricism: Historical & Contemporary Perspectives. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Hilary Putnam (1957). Red and Green All Over Again: A Rejoinder to Arthur Pap. Philosophical Review 66 (January):100-103.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads53 ( #38,250 of 1,693,218 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #82,927 of 1,693,218 )
How can I increase my downloads?