David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Axiomathes 17 (2):137-154 (2007)
The conceptualisation of movement has always been problematical for Western thought, ever since Parmenides declared our incapacity to conceptualise the plurality of change because our self-identical thought can only know an identical being. Exploiting this peculiar feature and constraint on our thought, Zeno of Elea devised his famous paradoxes of movement in which he shows that the passage from a position to movement cannot be conceptualised. In this paper, I argue that this same constraint is at the root of our incapacity to conceptualise the unseen movement at the micro-level and that the aporetic idea of super-position far from opening the gate on a deeper reality is a symptomatic word for this lack of understanding.
|Keywords||Zeno Movement Reality Parmenides Causality Quantum reality EPR Einstein Podolsky Rosen Quantum physics Zeno’s paradoxes|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Toru Tani (2008). The Ego, the Other and the Primal Fact. Continental Philosophy Review 41 (4):385-399.
Arne Naess (1984). A Defence of the Deep Ecology Movement. Environmental Ethics 6 (3):265-270.
Paul Souriau (1983). The Aesthetics of Movement. University of Massachusetts Press.
Tom Burke (2010). Empiricism, Pragmatism, and the Settlement Movement. The Pluralist 5 (3):73-88.
Maxine Sheets-Johnstone (2011). The Primacy of Movement. John Benjamins Pub..
Mark R. Baltin (2001). A‐Movements. In Mark Baltin & Chris Collins (eds.), The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory. Blackwell. 226--254.
Peggy J. Parks (2012). The Green Movement. Referencepoint Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads30 ( #48,009 of 1,004,675 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,743 of 1,004,675 )
How can I increase my downloads?