Graduate studies at Western
Journal of the History of Philosophy 45 (3):488-490 (2007)
|Abstract||The Stoics on Determinism and Compatibilism is an important book which reconstructs the arguments deployed by the Stoics in favour of the view that everything is necessary and examines the development of the different arguments given by the Stoics that this is compatible with moral responsibility and desert. The book carefully distinguishes two separate theses in Stoic theory, that everything that happens and is the case has a cause and that causation is necessitating. The book also provides a new reconstruction of Stoic compatibilism distinguishing four different compatibilist theories.Salles has written a book which is non-technical in it's approach and which assesses the Stoic positions on determinism, compatibilism, freedom and responsibility in the light of the modern debate on this issue. Covering not just the ancient debates and thinkers such as Epictetus and Chrysippus but also examining the compatibilist views of the major modern theorist Harry Frankfurt, finding indications of his main intuitions already present in the Stoic arguments and tackling the positions of Suzanne Bobzien|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Maykʻl Papazian (2007). The Stoics on Determinism and Compatibilism (Review). Journal of the History of Philosophy 45 (3):488-490.
R. W. Sharples (2006). Review: The Stoics on Determinism and Compatibilism. [REVIEW] Mind 115 (460):1171-1174.
Susanne Bobzien (1998). Determinism and Freedom in Stoic Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
Luca Castagnoli (2011). The Stoics on Determinism and Compatibilism. Ancient Philosophy 31 (1):228-235.
Jeremy Randel Koons (2002). Is Hard Determinism a Form of Compatibilism? Philosophical Forum 33 (1):81-99.
Ricardo Salles (2001). Compatibilism: Stoic and Modern. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 83 (1):1-23.
Thomas W. Settle (1993). How Determinism Refutes Compatibilism. Religious Studies 29 (3):353-62.
Mark Siderits (1987). Beyond Compatibilism: A Buddhist Approach to Freedom and Determinism. American Philosophical Quarterly 24 (April):149-59.
Gregory Harding (1997). Free Will and Determinism: Why Compatibilism is False. [REVIEW] Erkenntnis 47 (3):311-349.
Shaun Nichols (2008). Great Philosophical Debates. Teaching Co..
Saul Smilansky (2003). Compatibilism: The Argument From Shallowness. Philosophical Studies 115 (3):257-82.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2010-09-02
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?