World Futures 66 (3 & 4):243 – 265 (2010)
|Abstract||This article examines the use of organic and mechanistic metaphors that have underpinned the modeling of national governance in the social sciences and also framed the representation of the social impact of migration. It argues that the global patterns of migration and the contemporary forms of hybrid subjectivity do not fit well with these conceptual frameworks. The limits of this framework are examined through Harald Kleinschmidt's theory of residentialism, and the outlines of an alternative conceptual frame is proposed by drawing on key terms that have been developed in complexity theory|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Carlos Gershenson & Francis Heylighen (2004). How Can We Think the Complex? In [Book Chapter] (Unpublished).
Malcolm A. MacIver (2001). How Building Physical Models Can Reduce and Guide the Abstraction of Nature. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (6):1066-1067.
Richard Cooper & Bradley Franks (1993). Interruptibility as a Constraint on Hybrid Systems. Minds and Machines 3 (1):73-96.
Klaus Denecke & Katarzyna Hałkowska (1994). On P-Compatible Hybrid Identities and Hyperidentities. Studia Logica 53 (4):493-501.
Richard M. Burian (1997). Comments on Complexity and Experimentation in Biology. Philosophy of Science 64 (4):291.
Michael Gibbert, James A. Hampton, Zachary Estes & David Mazursky (2012). The Curious Case of the Refrigerator–TV: Similarity and Hybridization. Cognitive Science 36 (6):992-1018.
Daniel A. Weiskopf (2011). Models and Mechanisms in Psychological Explanation. Synthese 183 (3):313-338.
Added to index2010-05-07
Total downloads10 ( #106,239 of 549,066 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?