Authenticity and ambivalence: Toward understanding the enhancement debate

Hastings Center Report 35 (3):34-41 (2005)
: The differences between critics and proponents of enhancement technologies are easily overblown. Both sides of this debate share the moral ideal of being "authentic" to oneself. They differ in how they prefer to understand authenticity, but even this difference is not as stark as it sometimes seems
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1353/hcr.2005.0067
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 16,667
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 20 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

46 ( #74,293 of 1,727,257 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

10 ( #63,882 of 1,727,257 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.