A Comparative Study of the Concept of Dharmakaya Buddha: Vairocana in Hua-yen and Mahavairocana in Shingon Buddhism
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
International Journal of Buddhist Thought and Culture 2:305-331 (2003)
The concept of Dharmakaya is the central theme in both the Hua-yen and Shingon Buddhist literatures. Hua-yen Buddhism adopts Dharmakaya Vairocana Buddha as the main Buddha. Shingon Buddhism, on the other hand, claims that their secret doctrine is the direct teaching of Dharmakaya Mahavairocana Buddha. Even though these two schools are based on the same idea of Dharmakaya Buddha, the concepts of Vairocana in Hua-yen and Mahavairocana in Shingon are different in their doctrinal formulation. Hua-yen Buddhist literature elaborates the function of Dharmakaya Vairocana in the context of the three Buddha-body theory; the Shingon Buddhist literature elaborates Dharmakaya Mahavairocana in the context of the five Buddha Body theory. Shingon literature emphasizes the direct communication between Dharmakaya Mahavairocana and sentient beings, and expands his direct salvation of sentient beings in samsara. This process of salvation by Mahavairocana is based on compassion which is a fundamental merit of Mahavairocana. Compassion is the basic element of enlightening and saving sentient beings.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Francis H. Cook (1972). The Meaning of Vairocana in Hua-Yen Buddhism. Philosophy East and West 22 (4):403-415.
Jin Y. Park (2003). Living the Inconceivable: Hua-Yen Buddhism and Postmodern Différend. Asian Philosophy 13 (2 & 3):165 – 174.
Thomas Cleary (1983). Entry Into the Inconceivable: An Introduction to Hua-Yen Buddhism. University of Hawai'i Press.
Imre Hamar (1998). The Doctrines of Perfect Teaching in Ch'eng-Kuan's Introduction to His Commentary on the Hua-Yen-Ching. Journal of the Center for Buddhist Studies 3 (331):349.
Kang-Nam Oh (2000). The Taoist Influence on Hua-Yen Buddhism: A Case of the Sinicization of Buddhism in China. Chung-Hwa Buddhist Journal 13.
Yün-hua Jan (1981). The Mind as the Buddha-Nature: The Concept of the Absolute in Ch 'an Buddhism'. Philosophy East and West 31 (4):467-477.
Taisen Miyata (1998). A Study of the Ritual Mudrās in the Shingon Tradition: A Phenomenological Study on the Eighteen Ways of Esoteric Recitation (Jūhachidō Nenju Kubi Shidai, Chūin-Ryū) in the Koyasan Tradition. S.N.].
George Grimm (1958). The Doctrine of the Buddha, the Religion of Reason and Meditation. Berlin, Akademie-Verlag.
Roger R. Jackson (1999). Atheology and Buddhalogy In Dharmakīrti's Pramānavārttika. Faith and Philosophy 16 (4):472-505.
Whalen Lai (1984). Process Metaphysics and Hua-Yen Buddhism. Idealistic Studies 14 (3):278-278.
Ming-Wood Liu (1982). The Three-Nature Doctrine and its Interpretation in Hua-Yen Buddhism. T'oung Pao 68 (4-5):181-220.
Robert Gimello (1976). Chih-Yeh and the Foundations of Hua-Yen Buddhism. Dissertation, Columbia University
Francis Cook (1977). Hua-Yen Buddhism: The Jewel Net of Indra. Pennsylvania State University Press.
Added to index2011-08-31
Total downloads33 ( #127,816 of 1,934,371 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #145,866 of 1,934,371 )
How can I increase my downloads?