David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy East and West 51 (4):525-534 (2001)
Bhartṛhari claims that certain things cannot be signified--for example, the signification relation itself. Hans and Radhika Herzberger assert that Bhartṛhari's claim about signification can be validated by an appeal to twentieth-century results in set theory. This appeal is unpersuasive in establishing this view, but arguments akin to the semantic paradoxes (such as the "liar" paradox) come much closer. Unfortunately, these arguments are equally telling against another of his views: that the thatness of the signification relation can be signified. Bhartṛhari also claims that the relation of inherence cannot be signified--a quite different view that is not borne out by twentieth-century results. Finally, further research is needed to investigate what Bhartṛhari's own reasons might have been for these views
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Sthaneshwar Timalsina (2009). Bhartṛhari and Maṇḍana on Avidyā. Journal of Indian Philosophy 37 (4):367-382.
Hideyo Ogawa (2001). Bhartrhari on A .1.1.68. Journal of Indian Philosophy 29 (5/6):531-543.
Stewart Duncan (2011). Hobbes, Signification, and Insignificant Names. Hobbes Studies 24 (2):158-178.
J. Kalupahana David (1988). Essay Review. History and Philosophy of Logic 9 (2):225-232.
Ashok Aklujkar (2001). The Word is the World: Nondualism in Indian Philosophy of Language. Philosophy East and West 51 (4):452-473.
Toshiya Unebe (2011). “Apūrva,” “Devatā,” and “Svarga”: Arguments on Words Denoting Imperceptible Objects. [REVIEW] Journal of Indian Philosophy 39 (4-5):535-552.
Johannes Bronkhorst (2001). The Peacock's Egg: Bhartrhari on Language and Reality. Philosophy East and West 51 (4):474-491.
Jan E. M. Houben (1995). The Saṃbandha-Samuddeśa (Chapter on Relation) and Bhartṛhari's Philosophy of Language: A Study of Bhartṛhari Saṃbandha-Samuddeśa in the Context of the Vākyapadīya, with a Translation of Helārāja's Commentary Prakīrṇa-Prakāśa. E. Forsten.
Hans G. Herzberger & Radhika Herzberger (1981). Bhartrhari's Paradox. Journal of Indian Philosophy 9 (1):1-17.
Chien-Hsing Ho (2014). Meaning, Understanding, and Knowing-What: An Indian Grammarian Notion of Intuition (Pratibha). Philosophy East and West 64 (2):404-424.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads15 ( #112,733 of 1,099,913 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #304,017 of 1,099,913 )
How can I increase my downloads?