Correspondence

Philosophy and Public Affairs 10 (2):180-181 (1981)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

An act utilitarian tries to maximize expected utility. This is the sum of possible benefits, minus possible costs, with each benefit or cost multiplied by the chance that his act will produce it. Two recent essays claim that, in this calculation, the act utilitarian should ignore very tiny chances. If this is so, he will have no reason to vote, support revolutionary movements, or contribute to countless other public..

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A dilemma for objective act-utilitarianism.Gerald Lang - 2004 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 3 (2):221-239.
Publicity in morality.Brad Hooker - 2010 - Ratio 23:111-117.
Discussion.Brad Hooker - 1999 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 30 (1):113-129.
What is a correspondence theory of truth?D. Patterson - 2003 - Synthese 137 (3):421 - 444.
Correspondence.Derek Parfit & Charles Fried - 1979 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 8 (4):395-397.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
86 (#192,854)

6 months
6 (#504,917)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Derek Parfit
Last affiliation: Oxford University

Citations of this work

Totalism without Repugnance.Jacob M. Nebel - 2022 - In Jeff McMahan, Tim Campbell, James Goodrich & Ketan Ramakrishnan (eds.), Ethics and Existence: The Legacy of Derek Parfit. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 200-231.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references