Conscience and Collective Duties: Do Medical Professionals Have a Collective Duty to Ensure That Their Profession Provides Non-discriminatory Access to All Medical Services?
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 36 (1):28-52 (2011)
Recent debates have led some to question the legitimacy of physicians refusing to provide legally permissible services for reasons of conscience. In this paper, I will explore the question of whether medical professionals have a collective duty to ensure that their profession provides nondiscriminatory access to all medical services. I will argue that they do not. I will also argue for an approach to dealing with intractable moral disagreements between patients and physicians that gives both parties veto power with regards to participation. Finally, I will respond to three objections to allowing physicians broad freedom to act on their consciences: such allowances would violate the conscience of the patient, would lead to unfairness, and would thwart important societal goals
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Jean Bethke Elshtain (2008). Why Science Cannot Stand Alone. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 29 (3):161-169.
Daniel P. Sulmasy (2008). What is Conscience and Why is Respect for It so Important? Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 29 (3):135-149.
Citations of this work BETA
L. B. Mccullough (2011). Arboriculture in Clinical Ethics: Using Philosophical Critical Appraisal to Clear Away Underbrush in Ethical Analysis and Argument. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 36 (1):1-5.
Similar books and articles
Eva LaFollette & Hugh LaFollette (2007). Private Conscience, Public Acts. Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (5):249-254.
Dan W. Brock (2008). Conscientious Refusal by Physicians and Pharmacists: Who is Obligated to Do What, and Why? Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 29 (3):187-200.
Edwin C. Hui (2005). Doctors as Fiduciaries: Do Medical Professionals Have the Right Not to Treat? Poiesis and Praxis 3 (4):256-276.
J. L. A. Garcia (2007). Health Versus Harm: Euthanasia and Physicians' Duties. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 32 (1):7 – 24.
L. A. Jansen (2013). Between Beneficence and Justice: The Ethics of Stewardship in Medicine. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 38 (1):50-63.
Carolyn McLeod (2010). An Institutional Solution to Conflicts of Conscience in Medicine. Hastings Center Report 40 (6):41-42.
Chiara Lepora, Marion Danis & Alan Wertheimer (2009). No Exceptionalism Needed to Treat Terrorists. American Journal of Bioethics 9 (10):53-54.
Marlene S. Neill & Minette E. Drumwright (2012). PR Professionals as Organizational Conscience. Journal of Mass Media Ethics 27 (4):220-234.
Robert M. Veatch (2000). Doctor Does Not Know Best: Why in the New Century Physicians Must Stop Trying to Benefit Patients. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 25 (6):701 – 721.
Jan C. Heller (2012). Medical Professionalism, Revenue Enhancement, and Self-Interest: An Ethically Ambiguous Association. [REVIEW] HEC Forum 24 (4):307-315.
Elise Smith, Jason Behrmann, Carolina Martin & Bryn Williams-jones (2010). Reproductive Tourism in Argentina: Clinic Accreditation and its Implications for Consumers, Health Professionals and Policy Makers. Developing World Bioethics 10 (2):59-69.
Stephanie Collins (2013). Collectives' Duties and Collectivisation Duties. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 91 (2):231-248.
Gary Seay (2001). Do Physicians Have an Inviolable Duty Not to Kill? Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 26 (1):75 – 91.
Ronald J. Cavanagh (1980). Mutuality in Medical Services. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 1 (2):207-211.
Added to index2011-01-11
Total downloads4 ( #198,645 of 1,089,155 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #69,735 of 1,089,155 )
How can I increase my downloads?