correct provided the mathematical axioms of the metalanguage are true–and that proviso uses the very notion of truth that some people claim Tarski completely explained for us! Why do I say this? Well, remember that Tarski's criterion of adequacy is that all the T-sentences must be theorems of the metalanguage. If the metalanguage is incorrect and it can be incorrect with

In Maria Baghramian (ed.), Reading Putnam. New York: Routledge (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-31

Downloads
24 (#639,942)

6 months
6 (#504,917)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references