Dion, theon, and daup

Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 85 (1):85–91 (2004)
Abstract Here is a puzzle from the Stoic, Chrysippus: There was once a man called Dion, who was unfortunate enough to have his foot annihilated. Thereafter, he was known as Theon. Theon is identical to what was left over after Dion’s foot was removed. That is, Theon is that part of Dion that does not include his foot. If all this is true, then Theon is a proper part of Dion. That is, he is a part of Dion, but not identical to Dion. But if that’s right, then, surprisingly, Dion didn’t survive the loss of his foot.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified (fix it)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 5,882
External links
  •   Try with proxy.
  •   Try with proxy.
  •   Try with proxy.
  • Through your library Configure

    Similar books and articles
    F. W. Walbank (1958). Dion. The Classical Review 8 (3-4):269-.
    Bernard Mandeville (1954). A Letter to Dion. [Liverpool]University Press of Liverpool.
    Eric T. Olson (1997). Dion's Foot. Journal of Philosophy 94 (5):260-265.

    Analytics

    Monthly downloads

    Added to index

    2009-01-28

    Total downloads

    21 ( #59,654 of 556,914 )

    Recent downloads (6 months)

    1 ( #64,931 of 556,914 )

    How can I increase my downloads?


    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature


    Discussion
    Start a new thread
    Order:
    There  are no threads in this forum
    Nothing in this forum yet.

    Other forums