Haecceitas and the Bare Particular

Review of Metaphysics 44 (2):375 - 397 (1990)
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.2307/20129020
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 15,890
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Woosuk Park (1989). Common Nature and Haecceitas. Franziskanische Studien 71:188-192.
Jennifer McKitrick (2003). The Bare Metaphysical Possibility of Bare Dispositions. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 66 (2):349–369.
P. D. Magnus (2004). The Price of Insisting That Quantum Mechanics is Complete. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 55 (2):257-267.
James B. Reichmann (2006). Scotus and Haecceitas, Aquinas and Esse. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 80 (1):63-75.
Andrew M. Bailey (2012). No Bare Particulars. Philosophical Studies 158 (1):31-41.
Richard Brian Davis (2003). 'Partially Clad' Bare Particulars Exposed. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 81 (4):534 – 548.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

30 ( #103,865 of 1,725,404 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

6 ( #110,403 of 1,725,404 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.