David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophical Studies 46 (3):335-347 (1984)
It is widely agreed that constant conjunction is a necessary condition for a proposit'2on such as 'Every A is a B' being a law) That is each A is also a B (where A and B are kinds of events, objects states of affairs, or whatever) or the property of being an A is always conjoined with the property of being a B. It is also widely agreed that this cannot be the whole story. How can we distinguish accidental generalisations from laws? Why is it that 'Every massive object attracts every other massive object' is taken as a law, while 'Every golden object is less than a million kilograms (say) in mass' is not? Both are true universally, do not make reference to particular entities or places or times, and so on and so forth, and yet they are given vastly different ontological and/or epistemic status. This is the problem of laws
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Lina Eriksson & Alan Hájek (2007). What Are Degrees of Belief? Studia Logica 86 (2):185-215.
Daniel Nolan (2011). The Extent of Metaphysical Necessity. Philosophical Perspectives 25 (1):313-339.
Claudine Tiercelin (2002). La métaphysique et l'analyse conceptuelle. Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 4 (4):529-554.
John Bigelow (1990). The World Essence. Dialogue 29 (02):205-.
Jessica Pfeifer (2012). Mill and Lewis on Laws, Experimentation, and Systematization. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 43 (1):172-181.
Similar books and articles
Alexander Paseau (2006). Genuine Modal Realism and Completeness. Mind 115 (459):721-730.
John Roberts (2010). Some Laws of Nature Are Metaphysically Contingent. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 88 (3):445-457.
Josh Dever (2003). Modal Fictionalism and Compositionality. Philosophical Studies 114 (3):223 - 251.
Paul Sheehy (2006). Theism and Modal Realism. Religious Studies 42 (3):315-328.
Takashi Yagisawa (2009). Worlds and Individuals, Possible and Otherwise. Oxford University Press.
Stephen K. McLeod (2009). Rationalism and Modal Knowledge. Critica 41 (122):29-42.
Gonzalo Rodriguez-Pereyra (2004). Modal Realism and Metaphysical Nihilism. Mind 113 (452):683-704.
Kris McDaniel (2006). Modal Realisms. Philosophical Perspectives 20 (1):303–331.
Takashi Yagisawa (2008). Modal Realism with Modal Tense 1. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 86 (2):309-327.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads98 ( #41,633 of 1,907,694 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #196,519 of 1,907,694 )
How can I increase my downloads?