David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
British Journal of Aesthetics 44 (1):44-56 (2004)
The distinction between organic and inorganic nature receives little attention in contemporary nature aesthetics. Traditionally, however, this distinction was considered to have important aesthetic ramifications. Nick Zangwill has recently suggested that aesthetic differences between organic and inorganic nature arise because natural functions are present only in organic nature (for example, in the parts of organisms). I argue for a different explanation: though inorganic nature too has natural functions, these are metaphysically distinct from those characteristic of organic nature. I defend the claim that this difference in functions is aesthetically significant, and use it to justify a common intuition about the thesis of positive aesthetics for nature.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Glenn Parsons & Allen Carlson (2004). New Formalism and the Aesthetic Appreciation of Nature. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 62 (4):363–376.
Emily Brady (2011). The Ugly Truth: Negative Aesthetics and Environment. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 69:83-99.
Allen Carlson (2011). Aesthetic Appreciation of Nature and Environmentalism. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 69:137-155.
Min Xu & Guifang Deng (2015). Against Zangwill’s Extreme Formalism About Inorganic Nature. Philosophia 43 (1):249-257.
Similar books and articles
Malcolm Budd (2002). The Aesthetic Appreciation of Nature: Essays on the Aesthetics of Nature. Oxford University Press.
Malcom Budd (2000). The Aesthetics of Nature. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 100 (2):137–157.
Stephen Davies (2010). Functional Beauty Examined. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 40 (2):315-332.
Allen Carlson (1984). Nature and Positive Aesthetics. Environmental Ethics 6 (1):5-34.
Allen Carlson (2009). Nature and Landscape: An Introduction to Environmental Aesthetics. Columbia University Press.
Malcolm Budd (2006). Objectivity and the Aesthetic Value of Nature: Reply to Parsons. British Journal of Aesthetics 46 (3):267-273.
Glenn Parsons (2002). Nature Appreciation, Science, and Positive Aesthetics. British Journal of Aesthetics 42 (3):279-295.
Glenn Parsons (2006). Freedom and Objectivity in the Aesthetic Appreciation of Nature. British Journal of Aesthetics 46 (1):17-37.
Salim Kemal & Ivan Gaskell (eds.) (1993). Landscape, Natural Beauty, and the Arts. Cambridge University Press.
Nick Zangwill (2005). In Defence of Extreme Formalism About Inorganic Nature: Reply to Parsons. British Journal of Aesthetics 45 (2):185-191.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads22 ( #163,670 of 1,790,117 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #168,308 of 1,790,117 )
How can I increase my downloads?