David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
The aim of the dissertation is to propose a new understanding of the philosophy of Charles S. Peirce. Peirce sought to construct a philosophical system applicable to all of human experience, but he never presented this system in a uniﬁed work. In the dissertation I attempt to present the strongest possible reconstruction of Peirce’s mature philosophy. My thesis is that Peirce’s philosophy is best understood as an extended exploration and application of his concept of mathematical continuity, which he called "the master-key of philosophy." Many scholars have recognized that Peirce’s concept of continuity is important to his metaphysical theories. The bulk of the dissertation is devoted to examining this concept and explicating its importance throughout his philosophy. I argue that Peirce’s theory of semeiotic provides a general model of experience that elaborates the direct experience of continuity described in phenomenology. This model in turn serves as the basis for his metaphysics and evolutionary cosmology. Part I of the dissertation sketches Peirce’s response to Kant’s philosophy and presents an outline of his classiﬁcation of the sciences. Part II presents Peirce’s technical conception of continuity, showing its origins in formal logic and in his revision of Cantor’s theory of transﬁnite sets. Part III examines the role of the continuity principle in phenomenology, esthetics, ethics, and semeiotic, which bridge the rather wide gap between mathematics and metaphysics in Peirce’s system. Part IV presents an overview of Peirce’s cosmology and metaphysics, with particular attention to their methodological dependence upon semeiotic. Part IV includes consideration of two issues that emerge as crucial to the assessment of Peirce’s thought. The ﬁrst concerns the ontological status of extra-semeiotic entities, and is known as the problem of "semiotic idealism." I argue that Peirce is not a semiotic idealist. The second issue concerns the testability of Peirce’s metaphysical hypotheses..
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Kelly A. Parker (1998). The Continuity of Peirce's Thought. Vanderbilt University Press.
Joseph Ransdell (2007). T. L. Short on Peirce's Semeiotic. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 43 (4):654 - 662.
James Liszka (2007). Teleology and Semiosis: Commentary on T. L. Short's Peirce's Theory of Signs. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 43 (4):636-644.
James Jakób Liszka (2007). Teleology and Semiosis: Commentary on T. L. Short's. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 43 (4).
Catherine Legg (1998). Review of Liszka, "An Introduction to the Semeiotic of Charles Sanders Peirce". [REVIEW] Australasian Journal of Philosophy 76 (1):122-124.
Martin Lefebvre (2007). Peirce's Esthetics: A Taste for Signs in Art. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 43 (2):319-344.
Jérôme Havenel (2008). Peirce's Clarifications of Continuity. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 44 (1):pp. 86-133.
Carl R. Hausman (1993). Charles S. Peirce's Evolutionary Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
Paul Forster (2011). Peirce and the Threat of Nominalism. Cambridge University Press.
Mats Bergman (2007). Development, Purpose, and the Spectre of Anthropomorphism: Sundry Comments on T. L. Short's Peirce's Theory of Signs. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 43 (4):601 - 609.
Carl R. Hausman (2007). Metaphorical Semeiotic Referents: Dyadic Objects. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 43 (2):276-287.
Kelly Parker (1994). Peirce's Semeiotic and Ontology. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 30 (1):51 - 75.
Torill Strand (2013). Peirce's Rhetorical Turn: Conceptualizing Education as Semiosis. Educational Philosophy and Theory 45 (7):789-803.
Mats Bergman (2007). Development, Purpose, and the Spectre of Anthropomorphism: Sundry Comments on T. L. Short's. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 43 (4).
Added to index2010-12-22
Total downloads30 ( #139,332 of 1,934,369 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #195,883 of 1,934,369 )
How can I increase my downloads?