Two into one won't go: Conceptual, clinical, ethical and legal impedimenta to the convergence of Cam and orthodox medicine [Book Review]

Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 4 (1):7-19 (2007)
The convergence of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) and evidence-based medicine (EBM) is a prominent feature of healthcare in western countries, but it is currently undertheorised, and its implications have been insufficiently considered. Two models of convergence are described – the totally integrated evidence-based model (TI) and the multicultural-pluralistic model (MP). Both models are being incorporated into general medical practice. Against the background of the reasons for the increasing utilisation of CAM by the public and by general practitioners, TI-convergence is supported and MP-convergence is rejected. MP-convergence is epistemologically and clinically incoherent, and it cannot be regulated. It is also inconsistent with developments in the legal determination of the standard of care for both diagnosis/treatment and disclosure. These claims concerning MP-convergence are justified by the fact that science is not a member of the group of perspectives or world-views which postmodernism treats as equally valid, and this is especially important for healthcare.
Keywords 750403 Bioethics  Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM)   Evidence-based medicine (EBM)   Integrative medicine   Science   Postmodernism   Regulation   Standard of care   General practice  C1  321213 Human Bioethics
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11673-007-9031-z
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 23,201
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Malcolm Parker (2007). Rejoinder. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 4 (1):29-31.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

33 ( #143,384 of 1,940,964 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #457,978 of 1,940,964 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.