Logica Universalis 2 (1) (2008)
|Abstract||. The truth conditions that Aristotle attributes to the propositions making up the traditional square of opposition have as a consequence that a particular affirmative proposition such as ‘Some A is not B’ is true if there are no Bs. Although a different convention than the modern one, this assumption remained part of centuries of work in logic that was coherent and logically fruitful.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Larry Horn, Lexical Pragmatics and the Geometry of Opposition: The Mystery of *Nall and *Nand Revisited.
Mary Tiles & Yuan Jinmei (2004). Could the Aristotelian Square of Opposition Be Translated Into Chinese? Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 4 (1):137-149.
Dwayne Hudson Mulder (1996). The Existential Assumptions of Traditional Logic. History and Philosophy of Logic 17 (1-2):141-154.
Valentin A. Bazhanov (2008). Non-Classical Stems From Classical: N. A. Vasiliev's Approach to Logic and His Reassessment of the Square of Opposition. Logica Universalis 2 (1).
Luis Estrada-González (2008). Weakened Semantics and the Traditional Square of Opposition. Logica Universalis 2 (1).
Author unknown, Square of Opposition. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Wolfgang Lenzen (2008). Ploucquet's “Refutation” of the Traditional Square of Opposition. Logica Universalis 2 (1).
Antonino Drago (2008). The Square of Opposition and the Four Fundamental Choices. Logica Universalis 2 (1).
Terence Parsons, The Traditional Square of Opposition. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Manley Thompson (1953). On Aristotle's Square of Opposition. Philosophical Review 62 (2):251-265.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads36 ( #32,973 of 549,037 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,261 of 549,037 )
How can I increase my downloads?