David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
History of Philosophy Quarterly 3 (4):449 - 465 (1986)
Frege held various views about language and its relation to non-linguistic things. These views led him to the paradoxical-sounding conclusion that "the concept horse is NOT a concept." A key assumption that led him to say this is the assumption that phrases beginning with the definite article "the" denote objects, not concepts. In sections I-III this issue is explained. In sections IV-V Frege's theory is articulated, and it is shown that he was incorrect in thinking that this theory led to the conclusion that "the concept horse is not a concept." Section VI goes on to show that his strict theory about the functioning of ordinary language is inconsistent. Sections VII-VIII investigate Frege's reasons for thinking that "the concept horse" must denote an object; these reasons are not adequate on Frege's own grounds. Section IX sketches a systematic way to allow such phrases to denote concepts (not objects) within the framework of Frege's main views about language. Section X comments briefly on the consequences of this idea for his logistic program.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Fraser MacBride (2011). Impure Reference: A Way Around the Concept Horse Paradox. Philosophical Perspectives 25 (1):297-312.
Joongol Kim (2011). Frege's Context Principle: An Interpretation. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 92 (2):193-213.
Alex Oliver (2005). The Reference Principle. Analysis 65 (287):177–187.
Similar books and articles
Rosemarie Rheinwald (1997). Paradoxien Und Die Vergegenständlichung Von Begriffen – Zu Freges Unterscheidung Zwischen Begriff – Und Gegenstand. Erkenntnis 47 (1):7-35.
Marco Ruffino (2000). Extensions as Representative Objects in Frege's Logic. Erkenntnis 52 (2):239-252.
Marco Ruffino (2003). Why Frege Would Not Be a Neo-Fregean. Mind 112 (445):51-78.
Eva Picardi (1994). Kerry und Frege über Begriff und Gegenstand. History and Philosophy of Logic 15 (1):9-32.
Mark Textor (2010). Frege's Concept Paradox and the Mirroring Principle. Philosophical Quarterly 60 (238):126-148.
Michael E. Cuffaro (2012). Kant and Frege on Existence and the Ontological Argument. History of Philosophy Quarterly 29 (4):337-354.
Crispin Wright (1998). Why Frege Did Not Deserve His Granum Salis. Grazer Philosophische Studien 55:239-263.
William Gustason (1972). Frege, Geach, and `the Concept Horse'. Mind 81 (321):125-130.
Edwin Martin Jr (1971). Frege's Problems with 'the Concept Horse'. Critica 5 (15):45 - 64.
I. Susan Russinoff (1992). Frege and Dummett on the Problem with the Concept Horse. Noûs 26 (1):63-78.
Carlo Penco (2003). Frege: Two Theses, Two Senses. History and Philosophy of Logic 24 (2):87-109.
David Andrew Bell (1979). Frege's Theory of Judgement. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2011-05-29
Total downloads64 ( #22,993 of 1,101,095 )
Recent downloads (6 months)13 ( #13,485 of 1,101,095 )
How can I increase my downloads?