About de re belief
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 34 (4):569-575 (1974)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,875 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesAnthony Robert Booth & Rik Peels (2010). Why Responsible Belief is Blameless Belief. Journal of Philosophy 107 (5):257-265.
Andrew Chignell, The Ethics of Belief. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Daniel Whiting (2012). Does Belief Aim (Only) at the Truth? Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 93 (2):279-300.
Mark Pastin (1974). The Epistemic Nature of the Mental. Philosophical Studies 26 (November):247-254.
Ernest Sosa & Mark Pastin (1981). A Rejoinder on Actions and De Re Belief. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 11 (4):735 - 739.
David Hunter (2011). Alienated Belief. Dialectica 65 (2):221-240.
Michael Bergmann (2006). Epistemic Circularity and Common Sense: A Reply to Reed. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 73 (1):198–207.
Derek A. McDougall (1972). Religious Belief and Philosophical Analysis. Mind 81 (324):519-532.
Arnold Cusmariu (1977). About Belief De Re. Logique et Analyse 77 (2):138-147.
John Cottingham (2009). Why Believe? Continuum.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads19 ( #65,278 of 556,837 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,847 of 556,837 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
