Boolos on the justification of set theory

Philosophia Mathematica 15 (1):30-53 (2007)
George Boolos has argued that the iterative conception of set justifies most, but not all, the ZFC axioms, and that a second conception of set, the Frege-von Neumann conception (FN), justifies the remaining axioms. This article challenges Boolos's claim that FN does better than the iterative conception at justifying the axioms in question.
Keywords iterative conception  set theory  Frege  von Neumann  Boolos  axioms of set theory  justification of set theory  Frege-Neumann conception
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/philmat/nkl017
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 23,217
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Luca Incurvati (2014). The Graph Conception of Set. Journal of Philosophical Logic 43 (1):181-208.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

45 ( #105,695 of 1,941,077 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

2 ( #334,045 of 1,941,077 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.