Graduate studies at Western
Philosophical Quarterly 60 (238):169-175 (2010)
|Abstract||I explain why Ross Cameron's definition of ultimate ontological basis is incorrect, and propose a different definition in terms of ontological dependence, as well as a definition of reality's fundamental layer. These new definitions cover the conceptual possibility that self-dependent entities exist. They also apply to different conceptions of the relation of ontological dependence.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Phil Corkum (2008). Aristotle on Ontological Dependence. Phronesis 53 (1):65 - 92.
Phil Corkum (forthcoming). Substance and Independence in Aristotle. In B. Schnieder, A. Steinberg & M. Hoeltje (eds.), Ontological Dependence, Supervenience, and Response-Dependence. Basic Philosophical Concepts Series, Philosophia Verlag.
Louis deRosset (2010). Getting Priority Straight. Philosophical Studies 149 (1):73 - 97.
Venanzio Raspa (1999). Łukasiewicz on the Principle of Contradiction. Journal of Philosophical Research 24:57-112.
Robert Hanna (1983). The Nature of Creativity in Whitehead's Metaphysics. Philosophy Research Archives 9:109-175.
Attila Grandpierre (2002). The Fundamental Principles of Existence and the Origin of Physical Laws. Ultimate Reality and Meaning 25 (2):127-147.
Ross P. Cameron (2008). Turtles All the Way Down: Regress, Priority and Fundamentality. Philosophical Quarterly 58 (230):1-14.
Matteo Morganti (2009). Ontological Priority, Fundamentality and Monism. Dialectica 63 (3):271-288.
Fabrice Correia (2008). Ontological Dependence. Philosophy Compass 3 (5):1013-1032.
Added to index2009-07-03
Total downloads161 ( #2,883 of 739,473 )
Recent downloads (6 months)8 ( #12,331 of 739,473 )
How can I increase my downloads?