Mind and Hylomorphism
In John Marenbon (ed.), Oxford Handbook of Medieval Philosophy. Oxford University Press (2012)
| Abstract | For later medieval philosophers, writing under the influence of Aristotle’s natural philosophy and metaphysics, the human soul plays two quite different roles, serving as both a substantial form and a mind. To ask the natural question of why we need a soul at all – why we might not instead simply be a body, a material thing – therefore requires considering two very different sets of issues. The first set of issues is metaphysical, and revolves around the central question of why a human being needs a substantial form. The second set of issues is psychological, and turns on the question of why we should suppose that our mind is aptly characterized as a soul. This chapter takes up these two questions in turn, and then turns to whether we should suppose that one and the same thing – a soul – is both substantial form and mind. This dual-function thesis is the most distinctive feature of later medieval psychology, and is one reason that work from this era remains well-worth reading today. Whereas modern thought furnishes many sophisticated discussions of the immateriality of mind, and the metaphysics of body, philosophers since Descartes have rarely considered that it might be one thing, the soul, that accounts for both thought and substantial unity. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,672 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesJustin Skirry (2001). A Hylomorphic Interpretation of Descartes's Theory of Mind-Body Union. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 75:267-283.
Christina Van Dyke (2012). The End of (Human) Life as We Know It. The Modern Schoolman 89 (3-4):243-257.
Benjamin Hill (2006). Why We Can No Longer Rationally Believe That Our Intellective Soul is a Substantial Form. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 80:127-139.
Miguel Garcia-Valdecasas (2005). Psychology and Mind in Aquinas. History of Psychiatry 16 (3):291-310.
Marleen Rozemond (forthcoming). The Faces of Simplicity in Descartes’s Soul. In K. Corcilius, D. Perler & C. Helmig (eds.), The Parts of the Soul. De Gruyter.
Corinne Painter (2004). Aristotle and Functionalism. Epoché 9 (1):53-77.
Stewart Goetz (2011). A Brief History of the Soul. Wiley-Blackwell.
Nigel DeSouza (2012). Leibniz in the Eighteenth Century: Herder's Critical Reflections on the Principles of Nature and Grace. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 20 (4):1-23.
Timothy O'Connor (2000). Causality, Mind, and Free Will. Noûs 34 (s14):105-117.
Joël Biard (2008). Diversité Des Fonctions Et Unité de l'Âme Dans la Psychologie Péripatéticienne (XIV E -XVI E Siècle). Vivarium 46 (3):342-367.
David S. Oderberg (2005). Hylemorphic Dualism. Social Philosophy and Policy 22 (2):70-99.
J. Almog (2001). What Am I?: Descartes and the Mind-Body Problem. Oxford University Press.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2010-12-23Total downloads54 ( #18,805 of 549,069 )Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #25,703 of 549,069 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
