Managing data for integrity: Policies and procedures for ensuring the accuracy and quality of the data in the laboratory
Graduate studies at Western
Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (1):23-39 (2006)
|Abstract||A course focusing on ethical issues in physics has been taught to undergraduate students at Eastern Michigan University since 1988. The course covers both responsible conduct of research and ethical issues associated with how physicists interact with the rest of society. Since most undergraduate physics majors will not have a career in academia, it is important that a course such as this address issues that will be relevant to physicists in a wide range of job situations. There is a wealth of published work that can be drawn on for reading assignments|
|Keywords||research integrity data management training mentor principal investigator|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Marshall Thomsen (2007). A Course Treating Ethical Issues in Physics. Science and Engineering Ethics 13 (1):117-127.
Julie Richardson & Diane Hoffman-Kim (2010). The Importance of Defining 'Data' in Data Management Policies. Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (4):749-751.
Debbie Thorne LeClair (1998). Integrity Management: A Guide to Managing Legal and Ethical Issues in the Workplace. University of Tampa Press.
Greg Scherkoske (2013). Whither Integrity I: Recent Faces of Integrity. Philosophy Compass 8 (1):28-39.
Julia Frigoli, Anne M. Etgen & Michael Kuhar (2010). Developing and Communicating Responsible Data Management Policies to Trainees and Colleagues. Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (4):753-762.
Joe Giffels, Sara Vollmer & Stephanie Bird (2010). Editors' Overview: Topics in the Responsible Management of Research Data. Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (4):631-637.
Joan E. Sieber & Bruce E. Trumbo (1995). (Not) Giving Credit Where Credit is Due: Citation of Data Sets. Science and Engineering Ethics 1 (1).
Michael Kruse (1997). Variation and the Accuracy of Predictions. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48 (2):181-193.
Sharon S. Krag (2010). Issues in Data Management. Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (4):743-748.
Bryn Williams-Jones & Chris MacDonald (2008). Conflict of Interest Policies at Canadian Universities: Clarity and Content. [REVIEW] Journal of Academic Ethics 6 (1):79-90.
Margi Joshi & Sharon Krag (2010). Issues in Data Management. Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (4):743-748.
Julie A. Hubbard (2005). Eliciting and Measuring Children's Anger in the Context of Their Peer Interactions: Ethical Considerations and Practical Guidelines. Ethics and Behavior 15 (3):247 – 258.
Joan E. Sieber (1991). Openness in the Social Sciences: Sharing Data. Ethics and Behavior 1 (2):69 – 86.
Tricia Bertram Gallant, Michael G. Anderson & Christine Killoran (2013). Academic Integrity in a Mandatory Physics Lab: The Influence of Post-Graduate Aspirations and Grade Point Averages. Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (1):219-235.
Jaakko Hintikka (2005). Omitting Data—Ethical or Strategic Problem? Synthese 145 (2):169 - 176.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2010-09-01
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?