Graduate studies at Western
Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 16 (6):583-594 (2003)
|Abstract||Thus far, the moral debateconcerning genetically modified foods (GMF) hasfocused on extrinsic consequentialist questionsabout the health effects, environmental impacts,and economic benefits of such foods. Thisextrinsic approach to the morality of GMF isdependent on unsubstantiated empirical claimsand fails to account for the intrinsic moralvalue of food and food choice and theirconnection to the agent's concept of the goodlife. I develop a set of objections to GMFgrounded in the concept of integrity andmaintain that food and food choice can beintimately connected to the agent's personalintegrity. I argue that due to the constitutionof GMF and the manner in which they areproduced, such foods are incompatible with thefundamental values and integrity of certainindividual moral agents or groups. I identifythree types of integrity that are threatened byGMF: religious, consumer, and integrity basedon certain other moral or metaphysical grounds.I maintain that these types of integrity aresufficiently important to provide justificationfor political and societal actions to protectthe interests of those affected. I conclude byproposing specific steps for handling GMFconsistent with the moral principles ofinformed consent, non-maleficence, and respectfor the integrity of all members of society.They include mandatory labeling of GMF, theimplementation of a system for control andregulations concerning such foods, andguaranteed provision of conventional foods.|
|Keywords||authenticity food choice genetically modified foods integrity society ways of life|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Chris MacDonald & Melissa Whellams (2007). Corporate Decisions About Labelling Genetically Modified Foods. Journal of Business Ethics 75 (2):181 - 189.
Alan Rubel & Robert Streiffer (2005). Respecting the Autonomy of European and American Consumers: Defending Positive Labels on Gm Foods. [REVIEW] Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 18 (1):75-84.
Alison Bailey, Jan M. Boxill, Emmett L. Bradbury, Maudemarie Clark, Samir J. Haddad & Colin M. Patrick (2003). Book Notes. [REVIEW] Ethics 113 (4):923-928.
S. K. Wertz (2005). Are Genetically Modified Foods Good for You? A Pragmatic Answer. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 19 (1):129-137.
Celina Ramjoué (2007). The Transatlantic Rift in Genetically Modified Food Policy. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 20 (5):419-436.
Helena Siipi & Susanne Uusitalo (2008). Consumer Autonomy and Sufficiency of Gmf Labeling. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 21 (4):353-369.
Helena Siipi & Susanne Uusitalo (2011). Consumer Autonomy and Availability of Genetically Modified Food. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 24 (2):147-163.
Kirsten Hansen (2004). Does Autonomy Count in Favor of Labeling Genetically Modified Food? Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 17 (1):67-76.
Ruth Chadwick (2000). Novel, Natural, Nutritious: Towards a Philosophy of Food. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 100 (2):193–208.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads37 ( #37,060 of 740,406 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #17,236 of 740,406 )
How can I increase my downloads?