Descartes on the Errors of the Senses

Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 78:73-108 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Descartes first invokes the errors of the senses in the Meditations to generate doubt; he suggests that because the senses sometimes deceive, we have reason not to trust them. This use of sensory error to fuel a sceptical argument fits a traditional interpretation of the Meditations as a work concerned with finding a form of certainty that is proof against any sceptical doubt. If we focus instead on Descartes's aim of using the Meditations to lay foundations for his new science, his appeals to sensory error take on a different aspect. Descartes's new science is based on ideas innate in the intellect, ideas that are validated by the benevolence of our creator. Appeals to sensory error are useful to him in undermining our naïve faith in the senses and guiding us to an appreciation of innate ideas. However, the errors of the senses pose problems in the context of Descartes's appeals to God's goodness to validate innate ideas and natural propensities to belief. A natural tendency to sensory error is hard to reconcile with the benevolence of our creator. This paper explores Descartes's responses to the problems of theodicy posed by various forms of sensory error. It argues that natural judgements involved in our visual perception of distance, size and shape pose a problem of error that resists his usual solutions.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Are patients morally responsible for their errors?S. Buetow - 2006 - Journal of Medical Ethics 32 (5):260-262.
Descartes on the principle of alternative possibilities.C. P. Ragland - 2006 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 44 (3):377-394.
The Senses and the Fleshless Eye: The Meditations as Cognitive Exercises.Gary Hatfield - 1986 - In Amelie Rorty (ed.), Essays on Descartes' Meditations. University of California Press. pp. 45–76.
Malebranche over de onrust en de eerste mens.Roland Breeur - 2005 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 67 (1):3 - 35.
Descartes and the Theodicean Consequences of Human Error.Joel Thomas Tierno - 1992 - Dissertation, State University of New York at Buffalo
Descartes's theodicy.C. P. Ragland - 2007 - Religious Studies 43 (2):125-144.
Taxonomising the Senses.Fiona Macpherson - 2011 - Philosophical Studies 153 (1):123-142.
The significance of the senses.Matthew Nudds - 2004 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 104 (1):31-51.
Descartes' physiology and its relation to his psychology.Gary Hatfield - 1992 - In John Cottingham (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Descartes. Cambridge University Press. pp. 335--370.
Two errors in the text of the'Meditationes'?(Rene Descartes).M. Beyssade - 2000 - Archives de Philosophie 63 (1):A7 - A8.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-07-21

Downloads
121 (#137,843)

6 months
9 (#144,939)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Sarah Patterson
Birkbeck College

References found in this work

The First Meditation.John Carriero - 2017 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 68 (3-4):222-248.
Descartes on the cognitive structure of sensory experience.Alison Simmons - 2003 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 67 (3):549–579.
The fourth meditation.Lex Newman - 1999 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 59 (3):559-591.
Spatial Perception from a Cartesian Point of View.Alison Simmons - 2003 - Philosophical Topics 31 (1-2):395-423.

View all 7 references / Add more references