Perceptions of nano ethics among practitioners in a developing country: A case of india [Book Review]
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Nanoethics 4 (1):67-75 (2010)
Many developing countries have allocated significant amounts of funding for nanoscience and nanotechnology research, yet compared to developed countries, there has been little study, discussion, or debate over social and ethical issues. Using in-depth interviews, this study focuses on the perceptions of practitioners, that is, scientists and engineers, in one developing country: India. The disciplinary background, departmental affiliation, types of institutions, age, and sex of the practitioners varied but did not appear to affect their responses. The results show that 95% of the Indian practitioners working in the area of nanoscience and nanotechnology research recognized ethical issues in this research area, and 60% of them could offer specific examples, which included possible ill effects on environment and human, use as a weapon, hype, professional ethics, laboratory testing on animals, cyborgs, widening the gap between rich and poor, self-replication, and longevity of human life. The results may offer opportunities for future cross-cultural research, as well as offer examples that can be used to raise the awareness of other practitioners in India and elsewhere regarding the importance of ethical issues.
|Keywords||Cyborg Ethical issues India Nanotechnoscience Perception Practitioners|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Elaine Doyle, Jane Frecknall-Hughes & Barbara Summers (2009). Research Methods in Taxation Ethics: Developing the Defining Issues Test (Dit) for a Tax-Specific Scenario. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 88 (1):35 - 52.
Sergio Roman (2007). The Ethics of Online Retailing: A Scale Development and Validation From the Consumers' Perspective. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 72 (2):131 - 148.
Yungwook Kim & Soo-Yeon Kim (2010). The Influence of Cultural Values on Perceptions of Corporate Social Responsibility: Application of Hofstede's Dimensions to Korean Public Relations Practitioners. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 91 (4):485 - 500.
James V. Lavery (ed.) (2007). Ethical Issues in International Biomedical Research: A Casebook. Oxford University Press.
Jamal A. Al-Khatib, Mohammed Y. A. Rawwas & Scott J. Vitell (2004). Organizational Ethics in Developing Countries: A Comparative Analysis. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 55 (4):309 - 322.
Denise E. DeLorme, George M. Sinkhan & Warren French (2001). Ethics and the Internet Issues Associated with Qualitative Research. Journal of Business Ethics 33 (4):271 - 286.
Scott Mcintosh, Essie Sierra, Ann Dozier, Sergio Diaz, Zahira Quiñones, Aron Primack, Gary Chadwick & Deborah J. Ossip-klein (2008). Ethical Review Issues in Collaborative Research Between Us and Low – Middle Income Country Partners: A Case Example. Bioethics 22 (8):414-422.
Debasmita Patra (2011). Responsible Development of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology: Contextualizing Socio-Technical Integration Into the Nanofabrication Laboratories in the USA. [REVIEW] Nanoethics 5 (2):143-157.
Added to index2010-03-20
Total downloads22 ( #64,787 of 1,013,218 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,884 of 1,013,218 )
How can I increase my downloads?