David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Ethics and Information Technology 2 (3):181-187 (2000)
While maintaining the importance of privacy for critical evaluations of surveillance technologies, I suggest that privacy also constrains the debate by framing analyses in terms of the individual. Public space provides a site for considering what is at stake with surveillance technologies besides privacy. After describing two accounts of privacy and one of public space, I argue that surveillance technologies simultaneously add an ambiguityand a specificity to public places that are detrimental to the social, cultural, and civic importance of these places. By making public places accessible to other places and/or times, surveillance technologies make these social contexts ambiguous by blurring their spatial and temporal bounds. At the same time, surveillancetechnologies valence public places in functionally specificways that are detrimental to informal civic life. To complement defensive approaches to surveillance technologies based onindividual privacy, I conclude by suggesting how sociality as a relational value or an ethics of place as a contextual value could provide a proactive line of reasoning for affirming the value ofthat which is between people and places.
|Keywords||privacy public space sociality surveillance technology|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Luciano Floridi (2005). The Ontological Interpretation of Informational Privacy. Ethics and Information Technology 7 (4):185-200.
Tony Doyle & Judy Veranas (2014). Public Anonymity and the Connected World. Ethics and Information Technology 16 (3):207-218.
Similar books and articles
Byron Chell (1988). But Murderers Can Have All the Children They Want: Surrogacy and Public Policy. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 9 (1).
Edward J. Ottensmeyer & Mark A. Heroux (1991). Ethics, Public Policy, and Managing Advanced Technologies: The Case of Electronic Surveillance. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 10 (7):519 - 526.
Seumas Miller & John Weckert (2000). Privacy, the Workplace and the Internet. Journal of Business Ethics 28 (3):255 - 265.
Alan Rubel (2011). The Particularized Judgment Account of Privacy. Res Publica 17 (3):275-290.
Seda Gürses (2010). PETs and Their Users: A Critical Review of the Potentials and Limitations of the Privacy as Confidentiality Paradigm. [REVIEW] Identity in the Information Society 3 (3):539-563.
Benjamin Goold (2008). The Difference Between Lonely Old Ladies and CCTV Cameras: A Response to Ryberg. Res Publica 14 (1):43-47.
M. Zimmer (2005). Surveillance, Privacy and the Ethics of Vehicle Safety Communication Technologies. Ethics and Information Technology 7 (4):201-210.
Amy L. Fairchild, Ronald Bayer & James Colgrove (2008). Privacy, Democracy and the Politics of Disease Surveillance. Public Health Ethics 1 (1):30-38.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads54 ( #62,374 of 1,725,806 )
Recent downloads (6 months)10 ( #64,769 of 1,725,806 )
How can I increase my downloads?