Review: Hyder, The Determinate World: Kant and Helmholtz on the Physical Meaning of Geometry [Book Review]
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2010 (7) (2010)
Hyder constructs two historical narratives. First, he gives an account of Helmholtz's relation to Kant, from the famous Raumproblem, which preoccupied philosophers, geometers, and scientists in the mid-19th century, to Helmholtz's arguments in his four papers on geometry from 1868 to 1878 that geometry is, in some sense, an empirical science (chapters 5 and 6). The second theme is the argument for the necessity of central forces to a determinate scientific description of physical reality, an abiding concern of Helmholtz's, and one that, as Hyder shows, has Kantian roots. Helmholtz's commitment to the necessity of central forces was key to his responses to rival views on electromagnetism, and is a deep and often under-appreciated element of his epistemology of science.
|Keywords||Helmholtz Kant geometry electromagnetism|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Gary Hatfield (1984). Spatial Perception and Geometry in Kant and Helmholtz. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1984:569 - 587.
David Hyder (1999). Helmholtz's Naturalized Conception of Geometry and His Spatial Theory of Signs. Philosophy of Science 66 (3):286.
Matthias Neuber (2012). Helmholtz's Theory of Space and its Significance for Schlick. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 20 (1):163 - 180.
Lydia Patton, Hermann Von Helmholtz. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Alexis Bienvenu (2002). Helmholtz, critique de la géométrie kantienne. Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 3 (3):379-398.
Michael Busse & Änne Bäumer-Schleinkofer (1996). Ewald Hering und die Gegenfarbtheorie. NTM International Journal of History and Ethics of Natural Sciences, Technology and Medicine 4 (1):159-172.
Hermann von Helmholtz (1977). On the Origin and Significance of the Axioms of Geometry. In Robert S. Cohen & Yehuda Elkana (eds.), Hermann Von Helmholtz: Epistemological Writings. Reidel 1-26.
Gary Hatfield (1991). The Natural and the Normative: Theories of Spatial Perception From Kant to Helmholtz. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Hermann von Helmholtz (1977). On the Facts Underlying Geometry. In Robert S. Cohen & Yehuda Elkana (eds.), Hermann Von Helmholtz: Epistemological Writings. Reidel 39-58.
Michael Heidelberger (1993). Force, Law, and Experiment: The Evolution of Helmholtz's Philosophy of Science. In David Cahan (ed.), Hermann Von Helmholtz and the Foundations of Nineteenth-Century Science. University of California Press 461-497.
Hermann von Helmholtz (1971). The Conservation of Force: A Physical Memoir. In Russell Kahl (ed.), Selected Writings of Hermann Von Helmholtz. Wesleyan University Press 3-55.
David Cahan (ed.) (1993). Hermann Von Helmholtz and the Foundations of Nineteenth-Century Science. University of California Press.
Patrick Joseph McDonald (2003). Demonstration by Simulation: The Philosophical Significance of Experiment in Helmholtz's Theory of Perception. Perspectives on Science 11 (2):170-207.
O. Darrigol (2003). Number and Measure: Hermann Von Helmholtz at the Crossroads of Mathematics, Physics, and Psychology. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 34 (3):515-573.
Hermann von Helmholtz (1995). Science and Culture: Popular and Philosophical Essays. University of Chicago Press.
Added to index2011-02-25
Total downloads85 ( #34,370 of 1,725,565 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #349,436 of 1,725,565 )
How can I increase my downloads?