David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of the Philosophy of History 2 (1):63-82 (2008)
This essay redefines the crisis of historicism as a collapse of trust. Following Friedrich Jaeger, it suggests that this crisis should be understood, not as a crisis caused by historicist methods, but as a crisis faced by the classical historicist tradition of Ranke. The "nihilism" and "moral relativism" feared by Troeltsch's generation did not primarily refer to the view that moral universals did not exist; rather, they expressed that the historical justification of bildungsbürgerliche values offered by classical historicism did no longer work. In Niklas Luhmann's vocabulary, this is to say that moral values could no longer be trusted on historical grounds. But when the "reduction of complexity" offered by classical historicism collapsed, Troeltsch's generation faced a justification problem: what other modes of justification, if any at all, were available in a time of increasing secularization and growing feelings of discontinuity with the past? In identifying the crisis of historicism with this moral justification problem, this essay helps explain why such debts of despair could be reached in the early-twentieth-century disputes over historicism.
|Keywords||TRUST HISTORIOGRAPHY HISTORICISM RANKE MORAL VALUES TROELTSCH|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Thomas Sturm & Annette Mülberger (2012). Crisis Discussions in Psychology—New Historical and Philosophical Perspectives. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 43 (2):425-433.
Thomas Sturm & Annette Mülberger (2012). Crisis Discussions in Psychology—New Historical and Philosophical Perspectives. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 43 (2):425-433.
Similar books and articles
Peter Vogt (2010). Why We Cannot Make History. Some Remarks on a Lesson From Early Historicism. Journal of the Philosophy of History 4 (2):121-137.
Frank Schalow (1997). Heidegger, Dilthey, and the Crisis of Historicism. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 71 (4):621-623.
Jaap den Hollander (2010). Beyond Historicism: From Leibniz to Luhmann. Journal of the Philosophy of History 4 (2):210-225.
Andrew Reynolds (1999). What is Historicism? International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 13 (3):275 – 287.
Allan Megill (1997). Why Was There a Crisis of Historicism? History and Theory 36 (3):416–429.
Peter Woodford (2012). Specters of the Nineteenth Century: Charles Taylor and the Problem of Historicism. [REVIEW] Journal of Religious Ethics 40 (1):171-192.
Jack A. Bonsor (1990). An Orthodox Historicism? Philosophy and Theology 4 (4):335-350.
Reinbert A. Krol (2010). Friedrich Meinecke: Panentheism and the Crisis of Historicism. Journal of the Philosophy of History 4 (2):195-209.
Charles R. Bambach (1995). Heidegger, Dilthey, and the Crisis of Historicism. Cornell University Press.
Herman Paul (2010). Religion and the Crisis of Historicism: Protestant and Catholic Perspectives. Journal of the Philosophy of History 4 (2):172-194.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads26 ( #150,054 of 1,907,910 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #272,049 of 1,907,910 )
How can I increase my downloads?