A Proof that Libertarianism is Either False or Banal

Journal of Value Inquiry 34 (2/3):359-367 (2000)
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1023/A:1004782408394
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 15,831
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Paul Formosa (2007). Is Radical Evil Banal? Is Banal Evil Radical? Philosophy and Social Criticism 33 (6):717-735.
Gregor Damschen (2011). Questioning Gödel's Ontological Proof: Is Truth Positive? European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 3 (1):161-169.
E. M. Zemach (1987). Are There Logical Limits for Science? British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 38 (4):527-532.
Carl Ginet (2003). Libertarianism. In Michael J. Loux & Dean W. Zimmerman (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Metaphysics. Oxford: Oxford University Press 587-612.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

18 ( #150,511 of 1,724,865 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #349,138 of 1,724,865 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.