Bolzano's deducibility and tarski's logical consequence

History and Philosophy of Logic 2 (1-2):11-20 (1981)
In this paper I argue that Bolzano's concept of deducibility and Tarski's concept of logical consequence differ with respect to their philosophical intent. I distinguish between epistemic and ontic approaches to logic, and argue that Bolzano's deducibility presupposes an epistemic approach, while Tarski's logical consequence presupposes an ontic approach
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/01445348108837017
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 23,305
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Bernard Bolzano (2001). Wissenschaftslehre. [REVIEW] Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 2 (18):134-136.
Jan Berg (1962). Bolzano's Logic. Stockholm, Almqvist & Wiksell.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
José M. Sagüillo (1997). Logical Consequence Revisited. Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 3 (2):216-241.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

30 ( #158,797 of 1,932,585 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #456,397 of 1,932,585 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.