Bolzano's deducibility and tarski's logical consequence

History and Philosophy of Logic 2 (1-2):11-20 (1981)
In this paper I argue that Bolzano's concept of deducibility and Tarski's concept of logical consequence differ with respect to their philosophical intent. I distinguish between epistemic and ontic approaches to logic, and argue that Bolzano's deducibility presupposes an epistemic approach, while Tarski's logical consequence presupposes an ontic approach
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 9,360
External links
  • Through your library Configure
    References found in this work BETA
    Jan Berg (1962). Bolzano's Logic. Stockholm, Almqvist & Wiksell.
    B. Bolzano (2001). Wissenschaftslehre. Revue de Metaphysique Et de Morale 2:134-136.
    Citations of this work BETA
    Similar books and articles

    Monthly downloads

    Added to index


    Total downloads

    22 ( #65,949 of 1,088,831 )

    Recent downloads (6 months)

    1 ( #69,665 of 1,088,831 )

    How can I increase my downloads?

    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature

    Start a new thread
    There  are no threads in this forum
    Nothing in this forum yet.