David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Phronesis 48 (3):175 - 214 (2003)
According to an interpretation that has dominated the literature, the traditional interpretation as I call it, the recollection argument aims at establishing the thesis that our learning in this life consists in recollecting knowledge the soul acquired before being born into a body, or thesis R, by using the thesis that there exist forms, thesis F, as a premise. These entities, the forms, are incorporeal, immutable, and transcendent in the sense that they exist separately from material perceptibles, which in turn are related to them through participation and by being caused by them in some sense. But the properties of transcendence, immutability and incorporeality are sufficient to signal forms, and so the thesis that there exist forms claims that there exists entities with at least these three properties. In the first section of this paper, I argue that strong textual and more general exegetical reasons suggest that the traditional interpretation is mistaken. Furthermore, this interpretation, as I argue in the second section, fails to credit Plato with a proper argument for recollection. In section III, I present an alternative account of the argument for R in the "Phaedo". At the same time I defend a more general interpretation according to which the metaphysical doctrine Plato offers in the "Phaedo" represents a natural continuation of the philosophical position that stands at the centre of the dialectical conversations we find in the shorter Socratic dialogues
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
R. M. Dancy (2004). Plato's Introduction of Forms. Cambridge University Press.
G. Boys-Stones (2004). Phaedo of Elis and Plato on the Soul. Phronesis 49 (1):1 - 23.
Kristian Urstad, Pleasure in Plato's Phaedo. Philosophical Pathways.
Melinda Hogan (2003). Brute Error Without Sinn: Identity Claims in the Phaedo and in Frege. In Naomi Reshotko (ed.), Desire, Identity, and Existence: Essays in Honor of T.M. Penner.
Catherine Osborne (1995). Perceiving Particulars and Recollecting the Forms in the "Phaedo&Quot;. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 95:211 - 233.
Thomas Williams (2002). Two Aspects of Platonic Recollection. Apeiron 35 (2):131 - 152.
Mohan Matthen (1982). Plato's Treatment of Relational Statements in the Phaedo. Phronesis 27 (1):90-100.
Lee Franklin (2005). Recollection and Philosophical Reflection in Plato's Phaedo. Phronesis 50 (4):289-314.
Panos Dimas (2003). Recollecting Forms in the Phaedo. Phronesis 48 (3):175-214.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads20 ( #81,893 of 1,096,879 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #74,153 of 1,096,879 )
How can I increase my downloads?