David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Philosophical Research 31:249-275 (2006)
In contrast to recent trends that depict the later Wittgenstein’s work as wholly therapeutic in nature, this essay argues that the famous wood sellers scenario of Remarks on the Foundations of Mathematics is evidence of the later Wittgenstein’s linguistic naturalism and relativism. This scenario, like many others, is intended to show the naturalistic and arbitrary character of our own concepts, as well as the possibility of different forms of life with different concepts. David R. Cerbone’s more therapeutic take on these passages, that the purpose of the wood sellers is to demonstrate the impossibility of logically alien practices, is then addressed. It is shown that such a read is incompatible with numerous passages in Wittgenstein’s writings, overlooks the nexus of remarks within which this scenario appears, and ignores much of what Wittgenstein actually states about the wood sellers
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Felix Mühlhölzer (2001). Wittgenstein and the Regular Heptagon. Grazer Philosophische Studien 62 (1):215-247.
Bowell (2009). Filling Out the Picture: Wittgenstein on Differences and Alternatives. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 17 (2):203 – 219.
Paul A. Boghossian (1989). The Rule-Following Considerations. Mind 98 (392):507-49.
John V. Canfield (2009). Ned Block, Wittgenstein, and the Inverted Spectrum. Philosophia 37 (4):691-712.
Robert L. Arrington & Hans-Johann Glock (eds.) (1991). Wittgenstein's Philosophical Investigations: Text and Context. Routledge.
Paul Muench (1993). The Analogy Between Psychoanalysis and Wittgenstein's Later Philosophical Methods. Dissertation, University of Oxford
Mark Steiner (2001). Wittgenstein as His Own Worst Enemy: The Case of Gödel's Theorem. Philosophia Mathematica 9 (3):257-279.
Charles Sayward (2001). On Some Much Maligned Remarks of Wittgenstein on Gödel. Philosophical Investigations 24 (3):262–270.
Tine Wilde (2002). The 4th Dimension. Wittgenstein on Colour and Imagination. In Christian Kanzian, Josef Quitterer & Edmund Runggaldier (eds.), Persons. An Interdisciplinary Approach. Papers of the 25th International Wittgenstein Symposium. Austrian Ludwig Wittgenstein Society. 284-286.
Felix Mühlhölzer (2006). "A Mathematical Proof Must Be Surveyable" What Wittgenstein Meant by This and What It Implies. Grazer Philosophische Studien 71 (1):57-86.
Jonathan Westphal (1982). Brown. Inquiry 25 (4):417 – 433.
Steve Gerrard (1991). Wittgenstein's Philosophies of Mathematics. Synthese 87 (1):125-142.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2011-12-02
Total downloads1 ( #437,916 of 1,100,819 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?