Ifs and Cans - I

Canadian Journal of Philosophy 1 (2):249 - 274 (1971)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Austin's lecture on this topic contributes little to the problem of freedom of the will, and so in my discussion of his ideas I shall stop short of the difficult part of that problem. His most important positive suggestion is that hypotheticals should be divided into two classes, conditionals and pseudo-conditionals. He claims that neglect of this distinction has been the cause of mistakes in certain forms of the dispositional analysis of the statement that an agent could have acted otherwise, and he then goes on to criticise all forms of that analysis using arguments which do not depend on the difference between the two kinds of hypothetical.This discussion will be in two parts. In the first I shall take up Austin's distinction between conditionals and pseudos and criticise it and develop it at length, because it seems to me to be the most important thing in his lecture. Since I shall not have space for comment on fortuitous errors made by defenders of the dispositional analysis of the claim that an agent could have acted otherwise, I shall concentrate on the essential features of that analysis.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,221

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Ifs and Cans - II.D. F. Pears - 1972 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 1 (3):369 - 391.
Ifs and Cans.P. H. Nowell Smith - 1960 - Theoria 26 (2):85-101.
Cans without Ifs.Keith Lehrer - 1968 - Analysis 29 (1):29 - 32.
Aune and Others on Ifs and Cans.J. F. M. Hunter - 1968 - Analysis 28 (3):107 - 109.
Ifs, Cans and Causes.Keith Lehrer - 1959 - Analysis 20 (6):122 - 124.
Ifs and Cans Revisited.Don Locke - 1962 - Philosophy 37 (141):245 - 256.
'Ifs', 'cans' and determinism.R. D. Bradley - 1962 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 40 (2):146 – 158.
Ifs as labels on cans.Kenneth W. Rankin - 1980 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 10 (June):257-279.
Cans and ifs: Ability to will and ability to act.D. Goldstick - 2004 - Journal of Value Inquiry 38 (1):105-108.
Ifs, cans, and free will: The issues.Bernard Berofsky - 2002 - In Robert H. Kane (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Free Will. Oxford University Press.
Ifs and Oughts.Niko Kolodny & John MacFarlane - 2010 - Journal of Philosophy 107 (3):115-143.
Ands and cans.Morton White - 1974 - Mind 83 (330):248-259.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-04

Downloads
27 (#504,354)

6 months
1 (#1,028,709)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Functionalism and propositions.John Martin Fischer - 1985 - Philosophical Studies 48 (November):295-311.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Intention.P. L. Heath - 1960 - Philosophical Quarterly 10 (40):281.
Can and can't.A. M. Honoré - 1964 - Mind 73 (292):463-479.
Ifs and Cans Revisited.Don Locke - 1962 - Philosophy 37 (141):245 - 256.
The Refutation of Determinism.[author unknown] - 1968 - Philosophy 43 (166):390-392.

Add more references