David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Ethics and Information Technology 12 (3):277-288 (2010)
As we near a time when robots may serve a vital function by becoming caregivers, it is important to examine the ethical implications of this development. By applying the capabilities approach as a guide to both the design and use of robot caregivers, we hope that this will maximize opportunities to preserve or expand freedom for care recipients. We think the use of the capabilities approach will be especially valuable for improving the ability of impaired persons to interface more effectively with their physical and social environments
|Keywords||Capabilities approach Human flourishing Robot caregivers Robot ethics|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
H. E. Baber (2010). Worlds, Capabilities and Well-Being. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 13 (4):377 - 392.
Selmer Bringsjord (2007). Ethical Robots: The Future Can Heed Us. [REVIEW] AI and Society 22 (4):539-550.
Terrell Ward Bynum (2006). Flourishing Ethics. Ethics and Information Technology 8 (4):157-173.
Cristiano Castelfranchi (2000). Artificial Liars: Why Computers Will (Necessarily) Deceive Us and Each Other. [REVIEW] Ethics and Information Technology 2 (2):113-119.
Mark Coeckelbergh (2010). Health Care, Capabilities, and Ai Assistive Technologies. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 13 (2):181 - 190.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Isabella Paoletti (2001). Membership Categories and Time Appraisal in Interviews with Family Caregivers of Disabled Elderly. Human Studies 24 (4):293-325.
Robert Sparrow (2002). The March of the Robot Dogs. Ethics and Information Technology 4 (4):305-318.
Stephen Petersen (2007). The Ethics of Robot Servitude. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 19 (1):43-54.
Elizabeth Meins (2004). Infants' Minds, Mothers' Minds, and Other Minds: How Individual Differences in Caregivers Affect the Co-Construction of Mind. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):116-116.
Zahra Meghani & Lisa Eckenwiler (2009). Care for the Caregivers?: Transnational Justice and Undocumented Non-Citizen Care Workers. International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 2 (1):77 - 101.
Susan C. Johnson, Carol S. Dweck, Frances S. Chen, Hilarie L. Stern, Su-Jeong Ok & Maria Barth (2010). At the Intersection of Social and Cognitive Development: Internal Working Models of Attachment in Infancy. Cognitive Science 34 (5):807-825.
Shaun Gallagher (2013). You and I, Robot. AI and Society 28 (4):455-460.
Christopher Grau (2011). There is No 'I' in 'Robot': Robots and Utilitarianism (Expanded & Revised). In Susan Anderson & Michael Anderson (eds.), Machine Ethics. Cambridge University Press. 451.
E. Kubinyi, P. Pongracz & A. Miklosi (2010). Can You Kill a Robot Nanny?: Ethological Approach to the Effect of Robot Caregivers on Child Development and Human Evolution. Interaction Studies 11 (2):214-219.
Yvette Pearson & Jason Borenstein (2013). The Intervention of Robot Caregivers and the Cultivation of Children's Capability to Play. Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (1):123-137.
Added to index2010-07-07
Total downloads13 ( #127,346 of 1,101,947 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #68,246 of 1,101,947 )
How can I increase my downloads?