The Problem of Incommensurability: A Critique of Two Instrumentalist Approaches in Scientific Knowledge Socialized

Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science 108:385-398 (1988)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,139

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Incommensurability and the normative foundations of scientific knowledge.Gerald Doppelt - 2001 - In Paul Hoyningen-Huene & Howard Sankey (eds.), Incommensurability and Related Matters. Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 159--179.
Multisemiosis and Incommensurability.S. K. Arun Murthi & Sundar Sarukkai - 2009 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 23 (3):297-311.
Scientific Change and Counterfactuals in Scientific Knowledge Socialized.V. Rantala - 1988 - Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science 108:399-408.
On the Emergence of Scientific Disciplines in Scientific Knowledge Socialized.Hubert Laitko - 1988 - Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science 108:213-223.
The Gestalt Model of Scientific Progress in Scientific Knowledge Socialized.Craig Dilworth - 1988 - Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science 108:299-311.
On Millgram on mill.Dale E. Miller - 2004 - Utilitas 16 (1):96-108.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-04-05

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references