The relation between Wittgenstein's picture theory of propositions and Russell's theories of judgment
Philosophical Review 86 (2):177-196 (1977)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,679 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesDavid Pears (2002). Literalism and Imagination: Wittgenstein's Deconstruction of Traditional Philosophy. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 10 (1):3 – 16.
Anthony Palmer (2011). Propositions, Properties and Relations: Wittgenstein's “Notes on Logic” and the Tractatus. Philosophical Investigations 34 (1):77-93.
Ian Proops (2011). Russell on Substitutivity and the Abandonment of Propositions. Philosophical Review 120 (2):151-205.
V. Hope (1969). The Picture Theory of Meaning in the Tractatus as a Development of Moore's and Russell's Theories of Judgment. Philosophy 44 (168):140-.
Daniele Mezzadri (2010). Language and Logic in Wittgenstein's Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Dissertation, University of Stirling
Paul D. Wienpahl (1964). Wittgenstein and the Naming Relation. Inquiry 7 (1-4):329 – 347.
Graham Stevens (2006). Russell's Repsychologising of the Proposition. Synthese 151 (1):99 - 124.
Gregory Landini (1991). A New Interpretation of Russell's Multiple-Relation Theory of Judgment. History and Philosophy of Logic 12 (1):37-69.
Chris Pincock (2008). Russell's Last (And Best) Multiple-Relation Theory of Judgement. Mind 117 (465):107 - 139.
Peter W. Hanks (2007). How Wittgenstein Defeated Russell's Multiple Relation Theory of Judgment. Synthese 154 (1):121 - 146.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads44 ( #25,318 of 549,070 )Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #15,099 of 549,070 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
