David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
History of Philosophy Quarterly 29 (2):159-176 (2012)
According to Thomas Reid, an agent cannot be free unless she has the power to do otherwise. This claim is usually interpreted as a version of the Principle of Alternate Possibilities. Against this interpretation, I argue that Reid is committed to the seemingly paradoxical position that an agent may have the power to do otherwise despite the fact that it is impossible that she do otherwise. Reid's claim about the power to do otherwise does not, therefore, entail the Principle of Alternate Possibilities. When it is an agent's character that deprives her of alternate possibilities, she is not thereby deprived of either power or freedom, and this is true even if the agent was not free or active in the formation of her character.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Xiangdong Xu (2011). Thomas Reid on Active Power and Free Agency. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 6 (3):369-389.
William L. Rowe (2006). Free Will, Moral Responsibility, and the Problem of OOMPH. Journal of Ethics 10 (3):295-313.
Esther Kroeker (2007). Explaining Our Choices: Reid on Motives, Character and Effort. Journal of Scottish Philosophy 5 (2):187-212.
Gideon Yaffe (2004). Manifest Activity: Thomas Reid's Theory of Action. Oxford University Press.
Chris Lindsay (2015). Reid on Instinctive Exertions and the Spatial Content of Sensations. In Todd Buras & Rebecca Copenhaver (eds.), Thomas Reid on Mind, Knowledge and Value. Oxford University Press 35-51.
Paul Hoffman (2006). Thomas Reid's Notion of Exertion. Journal of the History of Philosophy 44 (3):431-447.
Christopher Yeomans (2006). Thomas Reid and Some Regress Arguments. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 88 (1):54-81.
Terence Cuneo (2011). A Puzzle Regarding Reid's Theory of Motives. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 19 (5):963-981.
Thomas Reid & John Haldane (2001). An Essay by Thomas Reid on the Conception of Power. Philosophical Quarterly 51 (202):1-12.
William L. Rowe (1991). Thomas Reid on Freedom and Morality. Cornell University Press.
Thomas Reid (1863). Thomas Reid's Inquiry and Essays. Bobbs-Merrill.
Richard M. Glatz (2008). The Necessity of Alternate Possibilities for Moral Responsibility. Philosophical Studies 139 (2):257-272.
Thomas Sturm (2011). Freedom and the Human Sciences: Hume’s Science of Man Versus Kant’s Pragmatic Anthropology. Kant Yearbook 3 (1):23-42.
Amit Hagar (2002). Thomas Reid and Non-Euclidean Geometry. Reid Studies 5 (2):54-64.
Added to index2011-09-14
Total downloads167 ( #23,467 of 1,939,032 )
Recent downloads (6 months)30 ( #16,693 of 1,939,032 )
How can I increase my downloads?