David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Classical Quarterly 3 (3-4):126- (1953)
In modern work on the Parmenides it is commonly supposed that in the First Part of the dialogue Plato's main concern is criticism of his own doctrine of Forms, or of some formulations of that doctrine, and that the criticisms have some sort of validity and are in some degree ‘damaging’ to the doctrine. It is thus often assumed that Plato's purpose is to make the reader ask himself, ‘Where is Plato wrong? Where is his doctrine of Forms, or his statement of it, inadequate?’ This is no doubt due partly to the fact that no reply is offered to the criticisms, and partly to the fact that they are put into the mouth of Parmenides, for whom Plato had a very great respect. Nevertheless, Plato can hardly have had a greater respect for Parmenides than he had for Socrates; and therefore on general grounds it is at least as likely that he intends us to ask ourselves the question, ‘Where is Parmenides wrong, or inadequate?’ It is, of course, obvious that Socrates is represented as a young man, who, in his enthusiasm for a new doctrine which he has invented himself, has not thought out all the difficulties involved in it or prepared replies to all the possible criticisms. Yet again, on general principles it is not likely that Plato would have written a dialogue primarily to represent Parmenides' position as substantially more satisfactory than that of Socrates . It is therefore of the first importance not merely to have clearly in our minds the nature and purpose of the doctrine of Forms, but also to examine carefully the basis of the criticisms which Parmenides is made to bring against Socrates, and the methods by which Parmenides conducts his arguments
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
David Evans (1994). Socrates and Zeno: Plato, Parmenides 129. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 2 (2):243 – 255.
Similar books and articles
A. L. Peck (1954). Plato's Parmenides: Some Suggestions for its Interpretation. II. Classical Quarterly 4 (1-2):31-.
J. Tate (1941). Plato and Parmenides Francis Macdonald Cornford: Plato and Parmenides. Parmenides' Way of Truth and Plato's Parmenides Translated with an Introduction and a Running Commentary. Pp. Xvii+251. London: Kegan Paul, 1939. Cloth, 12s. 6d. Net. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 55 (02):76-78.
John E. Sisko (2010). Anaxagoras Betwixt Parmenides and Plato. Philosophy Compass 5 (6):432-442.
J. A. Towey (1988). Plato's Parmenides. [REVIEW] American Journal of Philology 109:600-602.
Egil A. Wylter (1963). Two Recent Interpretations of Plato's Parmenides. Inquiry 6 (1-4):200 – 211.
Samuel Charles Rickless (2007). Plato's Forms in Transition: A Reading of the Parmenides. Cambridge University Press.
John Anderson Palmer (1999). Plato's Reception of Parmenides. Oxford University Press.
Patricia Curd (2000). PLATO'S PARMENIDES J. A. Palmer: Plato's Reception of Parmenides . Pp. Xiii + 294. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1999. Cased, £45/$65. ISBN: 0-19-823800-. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 50 (02):488-.
A. E. Taylor (1896). On the Interpretation of Plato's Parmenides. Mind 5 (19):297-326.
A. E. Taylor (1897). On the Interpretation of Plato's Parmenides. Mind 6 (21):9-39.
A. E. Taylor (1896). On the Interpretation of Plato's Parmenides. (I.). Mind 5 (19):297-326.
A. E. Taylor (1896). On the Interpretation of Plato's Parmenides. (II.). Mind 5 (20):483-507.
Egil A. Wyller (1962). Plato's "Parmenides:" Another Interpretation. Review of Metaphysics 15 (4):621 - 640.
Added to index2010-12-09
Total downloads8 ( #241,511 of 1,696,538 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #343,026 of 1,696,538 )
How can I increase my downloads?