Why shall legal reasoning be coherent?
In K. B. Agrawal & R. K. Raizada (eds.), Sociological Jurisprudence and Legal Philosophy: Random Thoughts On. University Book House (1993)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,679 |
| External links | This entry has no external links. Add one. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesKurt Nutting (2002). Legal Practices and the Reason of the Law. Argumentation 16 (1):111-133.
Aleksander Peczenik & Jerzy Wróblewski (1985). Fuzziness and Transformation: Towards Explaining Legal Reasoning. Theoria 51 (1):24-44.
Aleksander Peczenik (1985). Moral and Ontological Justification of Legal Reasoning. Law and Philosophy 4 (2):289 - 309.
Aleksander Peczenik & Jyrki Uusitalo (eds.) (1979). Reasoning on Legal Reasoning. Society of Finnish Lawyers.
Amalia Amaya (2011). Legal Justification by Optimal Coherence. Ratio Juris 24 (3):304-329.
F. Atria (1999). Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory Revisited. Law and Philosophy 18 (5):537-577.
Aleksander Peczenik (1988). Legal Reasoning as a Special Case of Moral Reasoning. Ratio Juris 1 (2):123-136.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads0Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
