All animals are equal, but …: management perceptions of stakeholder relationships and societal responsibilities in multinational corporations
Business Ethics 20 (2):177-191 (2011)
|Abstract||The stakeholder approach has become a popular perspective in mainstream management and the corporate social responsibility (CSR) literature. However, it remains an open question as to how real-life managers actually view stakeholders and what rationales and logics are used for explaining the relationship between the firm and its constituencies. This article examines whom managers in multinational corporations (MNCs) consider to be their important stakeholders, and how they describe the societal responsibilities towards these groups and individuals. It is concluded that managers still tend to hold a rather narrow (managerial) view of the firm and generally give priority to stakeholder groups who are directly involved in the firm's core transformation system. The conclusions are derived from interview and survey data from 647 managers in four MNCs. The paper is based on data collected as part of project RESPONSE: a European Union- and corporate-funded initiative on CSR|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Esben Rahbek Pedersen (2010). Modelling Csr: How Managers Understand the Responsibilities of Business Towards Society. Journal of Business Ethics 91 (2):155 - 166.
Kor Grit (2004). Corporate Citizenship: How to Strengthen the Social Responsibility of Managers? Journal of Business Ethics 53 (1-2):97-106.
Wesley Cragg & Alan Greenbaum (2002). Reasoning About Responsibilities: Mining Company Managers on What Stakeholders Are Owed. Journal of Business Ethics 39 (3):319 - 335.
Julia Roloff (2008). Learning From Multi-Stakeholder Networks: Issue-Focussed Stakeholder Management. Journal of Business Ethics 82 (1):233 - 250.
Denis Cormier, Irene M. Gordon & Michel Magnan (2004). Corporate Environmental Disclosure: Contrasting Management's Perceptions with Reality. Journal of Business Ethics 49 (2):143-165.
Johanna Kujala (2010). Corporate Responsibility Perceptions in Change: Finnish Managers' Views on Stakeholder Issues From 1994 to 2004. Business Ethics 19 (1):14-34.
Krista Bondy, Jeremy Moon & Dirk Matten (2012). An Institution of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in Multi-National Corporations (MNCs): Form and Implications. Journal of Business Ethics 111 (2):281-299.
MaryAnn Reynolds & Kristi Yuthas (2008). Moral Discourse and Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting. Journal of Business Ethics 78 (1-2):47 - 64.
James A. H. S. Hine & Lutz Preuss (2009). “Society is Out There, Organisation is in Here”: On the Perceptions of Corporate Social Responsibility Held by Different Managerial Groups. Journal of Business Ethics 88 (2):381 - 393.
David Lea (2004). The Imperfect Nature of Corporate Responsibilities to Stakeholders. Business Ethics Quarterly 14 (2):201-217.
Natalia Yakovleva & Diego Vazquez-Brust (2012). Stakeholder Perspectives on CSR of Mining MNCs in Argentina. Journal of Business Ethics 106 (2):191-211.
Mario Minoja (2012). Stakeholder Management Theory, Firm Strategy, and Ambidexterity. Journal of Business Ethics 109 (1):67-82.
Daewook Kim & Myung-Il Choi (forthcoming). A Comparison of Young Publics' Evaluations of Corporate Social Responsibility Practices of Multinational Corporations in the United States and South Korea. Journal of Business Ethics.
Supriti Mishra & Damodar Suar (forthcoming). Does Corporate Social Responsibility Influence Firm Performance of Indian Companies? Journal of Business Ethics.
Daniel Arenas, Josep M. Lozano & Laura Albareda (2009). The Role of Ngos in Csr: Mutual Perceptions Among Stakeholders. Journal of Business Ethics 88 (1):175 - 197.
Added to index2011-03-15
Total downloads9 ( #114,013 of 549,070 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,185 of 549,070 )
How can I increase my downloads?