Essentialism, history, and biological taxa

de Queiroz (1995), Griffiths (1999) and LaPorte (2004) offer a new version of essentialism called "historical essentialism". According to this version of essentialism, relations of common ancestry are essential features of biological taxa. The main type of argument for this essentialism proposed by Griffiths (1999) and LaPorte (2004) is that the dominant school of classification, cladism, defines biological taxa in terms of common ancestry. The goal of this paper is to show that this argument for historical essentialism is unsatisfactory: cladism does not assume that relations of common ancestry are essential attributes of biological taxa. Therefore, historical essentialism is not justified by cladism.
Keywords historical essentialism  cladism  biological taxa  natural kinds
Categories (categorize this paper)
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive
External links
  • Through your library Configure
    References found in this work BETA
    Marc Ereshefsky, Species. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

    View all 16 references

    Citations of this work BETA

    No citations found.

    Similar books and articles
    H. Clark Barrett (2001). On the Functional Origins of Essentialism. [Journal (Paginated)] (in Press) 2 (1):1-30.
    Joseph LaPorte (1997). Essential Membership. Philosophy of Science 64 (1):96-112.
    Mohan Matthen (2013). Millikan's Historical Kinds. In Dan Ryder, Justine Kingsbury & Kenneth Williford (eds.), Millikan and Her Critics. John Wiley & Sons. 135--154.
    Evan Fales (1982). Natural Kinds and Freaks of Nature. Philosophy of Science 49 (1):67-90.

    Monthly downloads

    Added to index


    Total downloads

    67 ( #17,909 of 1,088,833 )

    Recent downloads (6 months)

    37 ( #1,987 of 1,088,833 )

    How can I increase my downloads?

    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature

    Start a new thread
    There  are no threads in this forum
    Nothing in this forum yet.