David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy of the Social Sciences 39 (3):381-407 (2009)
Jürgen Habermas’s theories have received enormous attention in the public sphere as well as in political science. It is therefore surprising that his method, rational reconstruction, is not more debated. In political science the method is of particular interest because of its ambition to bridge the gap between empirical and normative approaches. In this article the author traces Habermas’s interest in rational reconstruction by going back to his writings on theory and practice and subsequently shows what the method’s main principles are. He then specifies how this methodological conception is used in Habermas’s political theory. Finally, the introduction of an empirical design allows the author to discuss one of the fundamental tensions in Habermas’s approach: the hypotheses arrived at through rational reconstruction are empirical hypotheses but cannot be tested by empirical means
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
James Gledhill (forthcoming). The Ideal and Reality of Epistemic Proceduralism. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy:1-22.
Theodore Lewis (2013). Validating Teacher Performativity Through Lifelong School-University Collaboration. Educational Philosophy and Theory 45 (10):1028-1039.
Similar books and articles
W. S. K. Cameron (2009). Tapping Habermas's Discourse Theory for Environmental Ethics. Environmental Ethics 31 (4):339-357.
Mathieu Deflem (ed.) (1996). Habermas, Modernity, and Law. Sage Publications.
Hugh Baxter (2011). Habermas: The Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Stanford Law Books.
Davide Panagia (2004). The Force of Political Argument. Political Theory 32 (6):825-848.
James Gordon Finlayson (2005). Habermas: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press.
Jørgen Pedersen (2008). Habermas' Method: Rational Reconstruction. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 38 (4):457-485.
Lasse Thomassen (2006). The Inclusion of the Other? Habermas and the Paradox of Tolerance. Political Theory 34 (4):439 - 462.
J. Pedersen (2012). Justification and Application: The Revival of the Rawls-Habermas Debate. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 42 (3):399-432.
Added to index2009-08-05
Total downloads31 ( #102,719 of 1,726,249 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #369,877 of 1,726,249 )
How can I increase my downloads?