David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy of the Social Sciences 38 (4):457-485 (2008)
Given the prominent position Habermas' philosophy has gained, it is surprising that his method, rational reconstruction, has not caused more debate. This article clarifies what this method consists of, and shows how it is used in two of Habermas' research programs. The method is an interesting, but problematic way of confronting some of the basic epistemological questions in the social sciences. It represents an alternative to both the empirical-analytical and the hermeneutic tradition. On the basis of this methodology, Habermas' work is situated between the transcendental and the empirical approach. A fundamental problem is that it remains unclear how to test the hypothesis put forward through rational reconstruction
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Stephen Buetow (2012). Making the Improbable Probable: Communication Across Models of Medical Practice. [REVIEW] Health Care Analysis (2):1-14.
Similar books and articles
Matheson Russell (2011). On Habermas's Critique of Husserl. Husserl Studies 27 (1):41-62.
Gary Banham (2007). Cosmopolitics : Law and Right. In Diane Morgan & Gary Banham (eds.), Cosmopolitics and the Emergence of a Future. Palgrave Macmillan.
Jaakko Hintikka (2011). Method of Analysis: A Paradigm of Mathematical Reasoning? History and Philosophy of Logic 33 (1):49 - 67.
Howard Sankey (2002). Realism, Method and Truth. In Michele Marsonet (ed.), The Problem of Realism. Ashgate. 64.
Hugh Baxter (2011). Habermas: The Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Stanford Law Books.
Calvin O. Schrag (1991). Reconstructing Reason in the Aftermath of Deconstruction. Critical Review 5 (2):247-260.
Michael Power (1993). Habermas and Transcendental Arguments: A Reappraisal. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 23 (1):26-49.
Terrence Kelly (2001). Sociological Not Political: Rawls and the Reconstructive Social Sciences. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 31 (1):3-19.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads39 ( #48,614 of 1,139,999 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #92,708 of 1,139,999 )
How can I increase my downloads?