David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Business Ethics 18 (4):335-348 (2009)
This paper explores moral sensitivity in a learning perspective, and a framework is developed for the understanding of how moral sensitivity can be developed through reiterative problem solving in the face of diverse ethical problems. Factors that may inhibit the individual's ability to conceive of moral issues are discussed, and perspectives from moral psychology are integrated with theory on problem formulation. It is argued that (1) the individual's moral sensitivity is pivotal for ethical problem solving, because problem formulation is paramount for further reflection and behaviour; (2) ethical behaviour must be understood both (a) in terms of the individual's psychological make-up that determines psychological response to moral features and (b) in terms of external constraints on the individual's moral sensitivity; and (3) the development of moral sensitivity can be promoted by actively and consciously pursuing disciplined imagination in multi-perspective formulations of problems.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
References found in this work BETA
James Agarwal & David Cruise Malloy (2000). The Role of Existentialism in Ethical Business Decision‐Making. Business Ethics 9 (3):143–154.
Aristotle (2012). Nicomachean Ethics. Courier Dover Publications.
Muriel J. Bebeau (1994). Influencing the Moral Dimensions of Dental Practice. In James R. Rest & Darcia Narváez (eds.), Moral Development in the Professions: Psychology and Applied Ethics. L. Erlbaum Associates. 121--146.
Lawrence Blum (1991). Moral Perception and Particularity. Ethics 101 (4):701-725.
Michael Bommer, Clarence Gratto, Jerry Gravander & Mark Tuttle (1987). A Behavioral Model of Ethical and Unethical Decision Making. Journal of Business Ethics 6 (4):265 - 280.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Yukiko di YouMaeda & Muriel J. Bebeau (2011). Gender Differences in Moral Sensitivity: A Meta-Analysis. Ethics and Behavior 21 (4):263 - 282.
Mark A. Seabright (2000). The Development of Moral Imagination. Business Ethics Quarterly 10 (4):845-884.
Axel Arturo Barceló Aspeitia (2012). Semantic and Moral Luck. Metaphilosophy 43 (3):204-220.
Kim Lützén & Beatrice Ewalds Kvist (2012). Moral Distress: A Comparative Analysis of Theoretical Understandings and Inter-Related Concepts. [REVIEW] HEC Forum 24 (1):13-25.
Julia N. Karcher (1996). Auditors' Ability to Discern the Presence of Ethical Problems. Journal of Business Ethics 15 (10):1033 - 1050.
Raymond de Vries (2011). The Uses and Abuses of Moral Theory in Bioethics. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 14 (4):419-430.
Liisa Myyry & Klaus Helkama (2002). The Role of Value Priorities and Professional Ethics Training in Moral Sensitivity. Journal of Moral Education 31 (1):35-50.
I. Van De Poel & L. Royakkers (2007). The Ethical Cycle. Journal of Business Ethics 71 (1):1 - 13.
I. van de Poel & L. Royakkers (2007). The Ethical Cycle. Journal of Business Ethics 71 (1):1-13.
Added to index2009-09-29
Total downloads11 ( #112,987 of 1,088,810 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?