David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy and Social Criticism 38 (6):619-643 (2012)
Social philosophy is a somewhat broad and imprecise term. In this article I discuss the social philosophy of Habermas, Foucault and Honneth, arguing that the latter’s work is an interesting, but not unproblematic, conception of the discipline. Following Habermas and Honneth, I argue that social philosophy should be reconstructive, but incorporate insights from Foucault. Specifically, reconstructive social philosophy can be both normative and descriptive, and at the same time establish a dialectical relationship between philosophy and the social sciences, thus fulfilling the ambition for social philosophy originally put forward by Horkheimer. The thesis I defend in this article is that reconstructive social philosophy in Habermasian or Honnethian fashion has the resources available to accomplish this ambitious task
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Axel Honneth (2001). Reconstructive Social Critique with a Genealogical Reservation. Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 22 (2):3-12.
Italo Testa, Brandom's Reconstructive Rationality. Some Pragmatist Themes. Towards an Analytic Pragmatism. Workshop on Bob Brandom's Recent Philosophy of Language.
Terrence Kelly (2001). Sociological Not Political: Rawls and the Reconstructive Social Sciences. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 31 (1):3-19.
Heikki Patomäki (1991). Concepts of "Action", "Structure" and "Power" in "Critical Social Realism": A Positive and Reconstructive Critique. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 21 (2):221–250.
Bernhard Peters (1994). On Reconstructive Legal and Political Theory. Philosophy and Social Criticism 20 (4):101-134.
Nikolas Kompridis (2001). On the Task of Social Philosophy. Social Philosophy Today 17:235-251.
R. Fine (2008). Judgment and the Reification of the Faculties: A Reconstructive Reading of Arendt's Life of the Mind. Philosophy and Social Criticism 34 (1-2):157-176.
Italo Testa (2012). Reconstruction and Pragmatist Metaphysics. On Brandom’s Understanding of Rationality. Verifiche: Rivista Trimestrale di Scienze Umane 41 (1-3):175-201.
Lambert Zuidervaart (2007). Social Philosophy After Adorno. Cambridge University Press.
Desh Raj Sirswal (2011). Philosophy of Social Change: Need of an Indian Model. In , The Positive Philosophy.
Jason L. Powell (ed.) (2012). Foucault: Issues and Legacy. Nova Science Publishers.
Harold Kincaid (1990). Defending Laws in the Social Sciences. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 20 (1):56?83.
James Bohman (1997). Pluralism, Indeterminacy and the Social Sciences: Reply to Ingram and Meehan. [REVIEW] Human Studies 20 (4):441-458.
Added to index2012-05-09
Total downloads10 ( #154,226 of 1,102,036 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #128,871 of 1,102,036 )
How can I increase my downloads?